NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M: specs and benchmarks

VS
Price now 1546$
Games supported 71%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
Buy
  • Interface MXM-B (3.0)
  • Core clock speed 944 + Boost
  • Max video memory 4 GB
  • Memory type GDDR5
  • Memory clock speed 2500 MHz
  • Maximum resolution
Year of release 2015
Performance 12.85

Summary

NVIDIA started GeForce GTX 965M sales 5 January 2015. This is Maxwell architecture notebook card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at gamers. 4 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 2.5 GHz are supplied, and together with 128 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 80 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is card attached via MXM-B (3.0) interface. Power consumption is at unknown.

It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at

12.85%

of a leader's which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti.

General info

Of GeForce GTX 965M's architecture, market segment and release date.

Place in performance rating341
Value for money1.06
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code nameN16E-GS, N16E-GR
Market segmentLaptop
Release date5 January 2015 (7 years ago)
Current price$1546 of 49999 (A100 SXM4)
Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs

GeForce GTX 965M's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of GeForce GTX 965M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024of 18432 (AD102)
CUDA cores1024
Core clock speed944 MHzof 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT)
Boost clock speed950 / 1151 MHzof 2903 (Radeon Pro W6600)
Number of transistors2,940 millionof 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile)
Manufacturing process technology28 nmof 4 (GeForce RTX 4080 Ti)
Thermal design power (TDP)unknownof 900 (Tesla S2050)
Texture fill rate73.60of 939.8 (H100 SXM5)
Floating-point performance2,355 gflopsof 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo)

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on GeForce GTX 965M's compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelarge
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNone
SLI options+

Memory

Parameters of memory installed on GeForce GTX 965M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GBof 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory bus width128 Bitof 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speed2500 MHzof 21000 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti)
Memory bandwidth80 GB/sof 14400 (Radeon R7 M260)
Shared memory-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce GTX 965M. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs
VGA аnalog display support+
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+
HDMI+
G-SYNC support+

Technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by GeForce GTX 965M. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+
GeForce ShadowPlay+
GPU Boost2.0
GameWorks+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+
Optimus+
BatteryBoost+
Ansel+

API support

APIs supported by GeForce GTX 965M, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.4
OpenGL4.5of 4.6 (GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile)
OpenCL1.1
Vulkan1.1
CUDA+

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance of GeForce GTX 965M. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 965M 12.85
  • Passmark
  • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
  • 3DMark Vantage Performance
  • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Score
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
  • GeekBench 5 OpenCL
  • 3DMark Ice Storm GPU
  • GeekBench 5 Vulkan
  • GeekBench 5 CUDA
  • Unigine Heaven 3.0
  • Octane Render OctaneBench
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 medical-01
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Maya
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01
  • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Catia
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Creo
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Medical
  • SPECviewperf 12 - Energy
  • Unigine Heaven 4.0

Passmark

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 26%

GTX 965M 3783

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 965M 7322

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 965M 23562

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 965M 34748

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 965M 4851

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 965M 5536

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 965M 15773

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

GTX 965M 259766

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

GTX 965M 16483

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

GTX 965M 13861

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

GTX 965M 66

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 965M 40

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

GTX 965M 40

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 965M 30

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 965M 3

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 medical-01

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 965M 16

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 965M 24

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 965M 26

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 965M 20

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 965M 40

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 965M 0.7

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 965M 26

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 965M 24

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 965M 30

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 965M 3

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 965M 20

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 965M 16

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

Benchmark coverage: 2%

GTX 965M 0.7

Unigine Heaven 4.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark, a newer version of Unigine 3.0 with relatively small differences. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. The benchmark is still sometimes used, despite its significant age, as it was released back in 2013.

Benchmark coverage: 1%

GTX 965M 574

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 965M. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 226 Mh/s  

Game benchmarks

Let's see how good GeForce GTX 965M is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

Full HD46
1440p25
4K20

Popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 31
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
Battlefield 5 52
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
Far Cry 5 38
Far Cry New Dawn 38
Forza Horizon 4 47
Hitman 3 12−14
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 31
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
Battlefield 5 43
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
Far Cry 5 35
Far Cry New Dawn 35
Forza Horizon 4 41
Hitman 3 12−14
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
Metro Exodus 15
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 13
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 13
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
Battlefield 5 35
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
Far Cry 5 32
Far Cry New Dawn 32
Forza Horizon 4 28
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
Hitman 3 12−14
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
Metro Exodus 12−14
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
Battlefield 5 12−14
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
Far Cry 5 22
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
Hitman 3 12−14
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
Metro Exodus 12−14
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
Battlefield 5 12−14
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
Far Cry 5 10
Far Cry New Dawn 31
Forza Horizon 4 14
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14

Relative perfomance

Overall GeForce GTX 965M performance compared to nearest competitors among notebook video cards.


AMD equivalent

We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 965M from AMD is Radeon HD 7970M, which is nearly equal in speed and is lower by 1 position in our rating.

AMD Radeon HD 7970M Radeon HD 7970M
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 965M:

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

AMD Radeon HD 7970M Radeon HD 7970M
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M GeForce GTX 780M
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M SLI GeForce GTX 770M SLI
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M GeForce GTX 880M
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8970M Radeon HD 8970M
Compare

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with GeForce GTX 965M according to our statistics.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.


4.3 65 ratings

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about GeForce GTX 965M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.