Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile with Radeon AI PRO R9700, including specs and performance data.

GTX 980 SLI Mobile
2015
2x 8 GB GDDR5, 330 Watt
34.47

AI PRO R9700 outperforms GTX 980 SLI Mobile by a whopping 116% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14611
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency8.4019.92
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameN16E-GXX SLINavi 48
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date22 September 2015 (9 years ago)23 July 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40964096
Core clock speed1126 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1228 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors10400 Million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)330 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rateno data747.5
Floating-point processing powerno data47.84 TFLOPS
ROPsno data128
TMUsno data256
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data64
L0 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data8 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed3500 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data644.6 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA+-
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD137
−112%
290−300
+112%
4K68
−106%
140−150
+106%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
−95.1%
400−450
+95.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−112%
180−190
+112%
Hogwarts Legacy 85−90
−112%
180−190
+112%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
−111%
270−280
+111%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
−95.1%
400−450
+95.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−112%
180−190
+112%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−112%
250−260
+112%
Fortnite 160−170
−86.3%
300−310
+86.3%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−111%
300−310
+111%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
−116%
250−260
+116%
Hogwarts Legacy 85−90
−112%
180−190
+112%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−105%
300−310
+105%
Valorant 210−220
−106%
450−500
+106%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
−111%
270−280
+111%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
−95.1%
400−450
+95.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−97.8%
550−600
+97.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−112%
180−190
+112%
Dota 2 140−150
−111%
300−310
+111%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−112%
250−260
+112%
Fortnite 160−170
−86.3%
300−310
+86.3%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−111%
300−310
+111%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
−116%
250−260
+116%
Grand Theft Auto V 120−130
−110%
260−270
+110%
Hogwarts Legacy 85−90
−112%
180−190
+112%
Metro Exodus 85−90
−107%
180−190
+107%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−105%
300−310
+105%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 132
−112%
280−290
+112%
Valorant 210−220
−106%
450−500
+106%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
−111%
270−280
+111%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−112%
180−190
+112%
Dota 2 140−150
−111%
300−310
+111%
Far Cry 5 110−120
−112%
250−260
+112%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
−111%
300−310
+111%
Hogwarts Legacy 85−90
−112%
180−190
+112%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−105%
300−310
+105%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
−103%
150−160
+103%
Valorant 210−220
−106%
450−500
+106%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 160−170
−86.3%
300−310
+86.3%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
−109%
190−200
+109%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
−114%
550−600
+114%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
−103%
150−160
+103%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−108%
110−120
+108%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−100%
350−400
+100%
Valorant 250−260
−99.2%
500−550
+99.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 95−100
−111%
200−210
+111%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−114%
90−95
+114%
Far Cry 5 85−90
−113%
190−200
+113%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−112%
220−230
+112%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
−109%
90−95
+109%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−106%
140−150
+106%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 95−100
−108%
200−210
+108%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−114%
90−95
+114%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
−105%
160−170
+105%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
−108%
50−55
+108%
Metro Exodus 30−35
−112%
70−75
+112%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
−96.1%
100−105
+96.1%
Valorant 220−230
−101%
450−500
+101%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
−107%
120−130
+107%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−114%
90−95
+114%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−111%
40−45
+111%
Dota 2 100−110
−115%
230−240
+115%
Far Cry 5 45−50
−108%
100−105
+108%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−103%
140−150
+103%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
−108%
50−55
+108%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
−108%
100−105
+108%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
−113%
100−105
+113%

This is how GTX 980 SLI Mobile and AI PRO R9700 compete in popular games:

  • AI PRO R9700 is 112% faster in 1080p
  • AI PRO R9700 is 106% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.47 74.31
Recency 22 September 2015 23 July 2025
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 330 Watt 300 Watt

AI PRO R9700 has a 115.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 600% more advanced lithography process, and 10% lower power consumption.

The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile
GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 70 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 9 votes

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 980 SLI Mobile or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.