Quadro T2000 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile

Place in performance ranking	241	247
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	31.78	4.69
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	N17E-G1	N19P-Q3
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	18 August 2016 (7 years ago)	27 May 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$237.11	no data
Current price	$240 (1x MSRP)	$2221

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1060 Mobile has 578% better value for money than T2000 Mobile.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	1024
CUDA cores	1280	no data
Core clock speed	1506 MHz	1575 MHz
Boost clock speed	1708 MHz	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	4,400 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	60 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	94 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	133.6	114.2
Floating-point performance	4,275 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile and Quadro T2000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
SLI options	-	no data

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	8000 MHz	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI	No outputs
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDCP	2.2	no data
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	+	no data
GPU Boost	3.0	no data
VR Ready	+	no data
Ansel	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1060 Mobile 21.08
+2.2%

T2000 Mobile 20.63

GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile outperforms Quadro T2000 Mobile by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1060 Mobile 8160
+2.2%

T2000 Mobile 7985

GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile outperforms Quadro T2000 Mobile by 2% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1060 Mobile 14693
+8.6%

T2000 Mobile 13524

GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile outperforms Quadro T2000 Mobile by 9% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	69 +6.2%	65−70 −6.2%
1440p	45 +12.5%	40−45 −12.5%
4K	29 +7.4%	27−30 −7.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

37
+12.1%

30−35

−12.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	62 +47.6%	40−45 −47.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	53 +47.2%	35−40 −47.2%
Battlefield 5	96 +39.1%	65−70 −39.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	73 +35.2%	50−55 −35.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	30 −10%	30−35 +10%
Far Cry 5	75 +38.9%	50−55 −38.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	69 +25.5%	55−60 −25.5%
Forza Horizon 4	102 +43.7%	70−75 −43.7%
Hitman 3	76 +26.7%	60−65 −26.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	62 +40.9%	40−45 −40.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	52 +52.9%	30−35 −52.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60 +36.4%	40−45 −36.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55 +37.5%	40−45 −37.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	54 +28.6%	40−45 −28.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45 +25%	35−40 −25%
Battlefield 5	81 +17.4%	65−70 −17.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	62 +14.8%	50−55 −14.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	25 −32%	30−35 +32%
Far Cry 5	68 +25.9%	50−55 −25.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	66 +20%	55−60 −20%
Forza Horizon 4	91 +28.2%	70−75 −28.2%
Hitman 3	64 +6.7%	60−65 −6.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45 +2.3%	40−45 −2.3%
Metro Exodus	40 +21.2%	30−35 −21.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27 −25.9%	30−35 +25.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	51 +15.9%	40−45 −15.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	69 +53.3%	45−50 −53.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	48 +20%	40−45 −20%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	37 −13.5%	40−45 +13.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	38 +5.6%	35−40 −5.6%
Battlefield 5	71 +2.9%	65−70 −2.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	23 −43.5%	30−35 +43.5%
Far Cry 5	64 +18.5%	50−55 −18.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	60 +9.1%	55−60 −9.1%
Forza Horizon 4	71 +0%	70−75 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	39 −15.4%	45−50 +15.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	28 −42.9%	40−45 +42.9%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	37 +19.4%	30−35 −19.4%
Hitman 3	30−35 +3%	30−35 −3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	29 +7.4%	27−30 −7.4%
Metro Exodus	23 +15%	20−22 −15%
Red Dead Redemption 2	17 +13.3%	14−16 −13.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	32 +18.5%	27−30 −18.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27 +22.7%	21−24 −22.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27 +42.1%	18−20 −42.1%
Battlefield 5	53 +15.2%	45−50 −15.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +8.3%	12−14 −8.3%
Far Cry 5	43 +22.9%	35−40 −22.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	45 +12.5%	40−45 −12.5%
Forza Horizon 4	57 +35.7%	40−45 −35.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +4.3%	21−24 −4.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	19 +26.7%	14−16 −26.7%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20 +33.3%	14−16 −33.3%
Hitman 3	20−22 +5.3%	18−20 −5.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8 −62.5%	12−14 +62.5%
Metro Exodus	14 +16.7%	12−14 −16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	11 +0%	10−12 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16 +14.3%	14−16 −14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	26 +23.8%	21−24 −23.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18 +38.5%	12−14 −38.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10 −10%	10−12 +10%
Battlefield 5	28 +16.7%	24−27 −16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Far Cry 5	21 +23.5%	16−18 −23.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	23 +15%	20−22 −15%
Forza Horizon 4	35 +20.7%	27−30 −20.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%

This is how GTX 1060 Mobile and T2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

GTX 1060 Mobile is 6.2% faster than T2000 Mobile in 1080p
GTX 1060 Mobile is 12.5% faster than T2000 Mobile in 1440p
GTX 1060 Mobile is 7.4% faster than T2000 Mobile in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1060 Mobile is 53.3% faster than the T2000 Mobile.
in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 62.5% faster than the GTX 1060 Mobile.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 1060 Mobile is ahead in 55 tests (81%)
T2000 Mobile is ahead in 9 tests (13%)
there's a draw in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	21.08	20.63
Recency	18 August 2016	27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	60 Watt