Quadro T2000 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
15.27

Quadro T2000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile by 35% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking321246
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money9.094.67
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameGP107N19P-Q3
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years old)27 May 2019 (4 years old)
Current price$545 $2221
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile has 95% better value for money than T2000 Mobile.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681024
CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed1493 MHz1575 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt60 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate77.76114.2

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and Quadro T2000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed7 GB/s8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Ansel+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 15.27
T2000 Mobile 20.60
+34.9%

Quadro T2000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile by 35% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 5918
T2000 Mobile 7985
+34.9%

Quadro T2000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile by 35% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 9616
T2000 Mobile 13524
+40.6%

Quadro T2000 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile by 41% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD56
−33.9%
75−80
+33.9%
1440p25
−20%
30−35
+20%
4K17
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 43
+2.4%
40−45
−2.4%
Battlefield 5 59
−16.9%
65−70
+16.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 47
−14.9%
50−55
+14.9%
Far Cry 5 47
−14.9%
50−55
+14.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 46
−19.6%
55−60
+19.6%
Forza Horizon 4 62
−12.9%
70−75
+12.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
−3%
30−35
+3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 39
−12.8%
40−45
+12.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 37
−13.5%
40−45
+13.5%
Battlefield 5 49
−40.8%
65−70
+40.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 33
−63.6%
50−55
+63.6%
Far Cry 5 44
−22.7%
50−55
+22.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 42
−31%
55−60
+31%
Forza Horizon 4 57
−22.8%
70−75
+22.8%
Metro Exodus 19
−73.7%
30−35
+73.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−36%
30−35
+36%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 33
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 23
−82.6%
40−45
+82.6%
Battlefield 5 42
−64.3%
65−70
+64.3%
Far Cry 5 40
−35%
50−55
+35%
Far Cry New Dawn 38
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%
Forza Horizon 4 43
−62.8%
70−75
+62.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
−73.1%
45−50
+73.1%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21
−47.6%
30−35
+47.6%
Metro Exodus 12
−66.7%
20−22
+66.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−36.4%
14−16
+36.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
−58.8%
27−30
+58.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−37.5%
21−24
+37.5%
Battlefield 5 29
−58.6%
45−50
+58.6%
Far Cry 5 26
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 27
−48.1%
40−45
+48.1%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−40%
40−45
+40%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4
−275%
14−16
+275%
Metro Exodus 7
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8
−75%
14−16
+75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−44.4%
12−14
+44.4%
Battlefield 5 16−18
−50%
24−27
+50%
Far Cry 5 12
−41.7%
16−18
+41.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 13
−53.8%
20−22
+53.8%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−38.1%
27−30
+38.1%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and T2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • T2000 Mobile is 33.9% faster than GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

1440p resolution:

  • T2000 Mobile is 20% faster than GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

4K resolution:

  • T2000 Mobile is 23.5% faster than GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 4.4% faster than the T2000 Mobile.
  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 275% faster than the GTX 1050 Ti Mobile.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is ahead in 2 tests (5%)
  • T2000 Mobile is ahead in 41 test (95%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 15.27 20.60
Recency 3 January 2017 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 60 Watt

The Quadro T2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Quadro T2000 Mobile

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 726 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 252 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.