UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) vs FirePro D500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

FirePro D500
2014
3 GB GDDR5, 274 Watt
10.73
+253%

FirePro D500 outperforms UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) by a whopping 253% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking395729
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.79no data
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Gen. 12 (2021)
GPU code nameTahitiRocket Lake Xe
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date18 January 2014 (10 years ago)30 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price$475 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153632
Core clock speed725 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1450 MHz
Number of transistors4,313 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)274 Wattno data
Texture fill rate69.60no data
Floating-point performance2,227 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length279 mmno data
Width2-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount3 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed5080 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth243.8 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort, 1x SDIno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75−80
+241%
22
−241%
1440p70−75
+233%
21
−233%
4K35−40
+250%
10
−250%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+238%
8−9
−238%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+246%
12−14
−246%
Hitman 3 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+242%
18−20
−242%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+233%
15
−233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+253%
16−18
−253%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Battlefield 5 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+238%
8−9
−238%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+246%
12−14
−246%
Hitman 3 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+253%
51
−253%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+233%
12
−233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+253%
16−18
−253%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+246%
12−14
−246%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+242%
18−20
−242%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+246%
13
−246%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+253%
16−18
−253%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Hitman 3 27−30
+238%
8−9
−238%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+238%
8−9
−238%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+220%
5−6
−220%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%

This is how FirePro D500 and UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) compete in popular games:

  • FirePro D500 is 241% faster in 1080p
  • FirePro D500 is 233% faster in 1440p
  • FirePro D500 is 250% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.73 3.04
Recency 18 January 2014 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

The FirePro D500 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro D500 is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro D500
FirePro D500
Intel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 19 votes

Rate FirePro D500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 7 votes

Rate UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.