Radeon Pro 560X vs Pro WX 4100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Pro WX 4100 Pro WX 4200 Pro WX 5100 Pro WX 7100 Pro WX 8100 Pro WX 8200 Pro WX 9200
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Pro 555 Pro 555X Pro 560 Pro 560X Pro 570 Pro 570X Pro 575 Pro 575X Pro 580 Pro 580X

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro WX 4100 with Radeon Pro 560X, including specs and performance data.

Pro WX 4100
2016, $399
4 GB GDDR5, 50 Watt
8.81
+0.2%

Contents

Share:
Pro WX 4100 Pro WX 4100
Pro 560X Pro 560X

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking530532
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.45no data
Power efficiency13.549.01
ArchitectureGCN 4.0 (2016−2020)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameBaffinPolaris 21
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date10 November 2016 (9 years ago)16 July 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241024
Core clock speed1125 MHz1004 MHz
Boost clock speed1201 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,000 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate76.8664.26
Floating-point processing power2.46 TFLOPS2.056 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs6464
L1 Cache256 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1270 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s81.28 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Pro WX 4100 8.81
+0.2%
Pro 560X 8.79

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 4100 3684
+0.2%
Samples: 256
Pro 560X 3677
Samples: 2

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Pro WX 4100 19051
+8.7%
Pro 560X 17519

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Pro WX 4100 18703
+10.6%
Pro 560X 16903

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
−2.5%
41
+2.5%
1440p40−45
−7.5%
43
+7.5%
4K16−18
−6.3%
17
+6.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p9.98no data
1440p9.98no data
4K24.94no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 43
+0%
43
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 37
+0%
37
+0%
Fortnite 66
+0%
66
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 53
+0%
53
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 36
+0%
36
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 86
+0%
86
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Dota 2 71
+0%
71
+0%
Far Cry 5 33
+0%
33
+0%
Fortnite 40
+0%
40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50
+0%
50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 33
+0%
33
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 19
+0%
19
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40
+0%
40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 34
+0%
34
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 33
+0%
33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Dota 2 69
+0%
69
+0%
Far Cry 5 31
+0%
31
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 36
+0%
36
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
+0%
20
+0%
Valorant 26
+0%
26
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 32
+0%
32
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 57
+0%
57
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 11
+0%
11
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30
+0%
30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+0%
13
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Metro Exodus 7
+0%
7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 10
+0%
10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

This is how Pro WX 4100 and Pro 560X compete in popular games:

  • Pro 560X is 3% faster in 1080p
  • Pro 560X is 8% faster in 1440p
  • Pro 560X is 6% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 8.81 8.79
Recency 10 November 2016 16 July 2018
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 75 Watt

Pro WX 4100 has a 0.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% lower power consumption.

Pro 560X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro WX 4100 and Radeon Pro 560X.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4100 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon Pro 560X is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100
Radeon Pro WX 4100
AMD Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560X
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4100
vs
P104-100 P104 100
Pro 560X Radeon Pro 560X
vs
W7170M FirePro W7170M
Pro WX 4100 Radeon Pro WX 4100
vs
GRID M60-1Q GRID M60-1Q
Pro WX 4100 AMD Pro WX 4100
vs
Pro 575 575
Pro WX 4100 AMD Pro WX 4100
vs
Pro 580 580
Pro WX 4100 AMD Pro WX 4100
vs
Vega Frontier Edition Liquid Frontier Edition Liquid
Pro WX 4100 AMD Pro WX 4100
vs
GeForce MX110 MX110
Pro WX 4100 AMD Pro WX 4100
vs
R7 240 OEM 240 OEM
Pro WX 4100 AMD Pro WX 4100
vs
Pro 555X 555X
Pro WX 4100 AMD Pro WX 4100
vs
FirePro A300 A300
Pro WX 4100 AMD Pro WX 4100
vs
GeForce 6100 6100
Pro WX 4100 AMD Pro WX 4100
vs
UHD Graphics 617 617
Pro WX 4100 AMD Pro WX 4100
vs
Pro 570X 570X

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 53 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 4100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 207 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 560X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro WX 4100 or Radeon Pro 560X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.