Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 vs FX-9830P

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing FX-9830P and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1871not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgePentium 4-M
Power efficiency5.68no data
Architecture codenameBristol Ridge (2016−2019)Northwood (2002−2004)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

FX-9830P and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus rateno data400 MHz
L1 cache320 KBno data
L2 cache1 MB (per module)no data
Chip lithography28 nm130 nm
Die size250 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors3,100 millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on FX-9830P and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFP4no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by FX-9830P and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by FX-9830P and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-9830P and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3, DDR4no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-9830P and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes8no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

FX-9830P 10.27
+2305%
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 247

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 30 Watt

FX-9830P has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7, on the other hand, has 16.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between FX-9830P and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between FX-9830P and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD FX-9830P
FX-9830P
Intel Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 113 votes

Rate FX-9830P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 12 votes

Rate Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about FX-9830P or Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.