A4-4355M vs Celeron M 575
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 575 and A4-4355M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | 2763 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Celeron M | AMD A-Series |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Trinity (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 1 June 2008 (16 years ago) | 27 September 2012 (11 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $86 | no data |
| Current price | $235 (2.7x MSRP) | $210 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 575 and A4-4355M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Bus support | 667 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 96 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | no data | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 246 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | 1,303 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 575 and A4-4355M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | PPGA478 | FP2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 575 and A4-4355M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA |
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 575 and A4-4355M are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 575 and A4-4355M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | unknown Dual-channel |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon HD 7400G |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
Celeron M 575 outperforms A4-4355M by 13% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
A4-4355M outperforms Celeron M 575 by 21% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Benchmark coverage: 19%
A4-4355M outperforms Celeron M 575 by 38% in 3DMark06 CPU.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 June 2008 | 27 September 2012 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 2 |
| Threads | 1 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 17 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 575 and A4-4355M. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 575 and A4-4355M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
