Intel Celeron M 575 vs AMD Phenom II X4 P960

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

General info

Comparing Phenom II X4 P960 and Celeron M 575 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2320not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series4x AMD Phenom IIIntel Celeron M
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date19 October 2010 (13 years old)1 June 2008 (15 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$86
Current priceno data$235 (2.7x MSRP)

Technical specs

Phenom II X4 P960 and Celeron M 575 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Boost clock speed1.8 GHz2 GHz
Bus support3600 MHz667 MHz
L1 cache512 KBno data
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data143 mm2
Number of transistorsno data291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Phenom II X4 P960 and Celeron M 575 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketS1 (S1g4)PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Phenom II X4 P960 and Celeron M 575. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow, SSE (1,2,3,4A), AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, integrated DDR3-1066 memory controller, HyperTransport 3.0no data
VirusProtect+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Phenom II X4 P960 and Celeron M 575 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Phenom II X4 P960 and Celeron M 575. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Phenom II X4 P960 1542
Celeron M 575 1917
+24.3%

Celeron M 575 outperforms Phenom II X4 P960 by 24% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Phenom II X4 P960 5354
+179%
Celeron M 575 1917

Phenom II X4 P960 outperforms Celeron M 575 by 179% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Phenom II X4 P960 2519
+181%
Celeron M 575 898

Phenom II X4 P960 outperforms Celeron M 575 by 181% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 19 October 2010 1 June 2008
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 31 Watt

We couldn't decide between Phenom II X4 P960 and Celeron M 575. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Phenom II X4 P960 and Celeron M 575, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Phenom II X4 P960
Phenom II X4 P960
Intel Celeron M 575
Celeron M 575

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 146 votes

Rate AMD Phenom II X4 P960 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 9 votes

Rate Intel Celeron M 575 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Phenom II X4 P960 or Celeron M 575, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.