V-Series V140 vs Celeron M 575

Place in the ranking	3165	3138
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Intel Celeron M	AMD V-Series
Power efficiency	0.76	1.02
Architecture codename	Merom (2006−2008)	Champlain (2010−2011)
Release date	1 June 2008 (16 years ago)	4 October 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$86	no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 575 and V-Series V140 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	1	1
Boost clock speed	2 GHz	2.3 GHz
Bus rate	667 MHz	3200 MHz
L1 cache	no data	128 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	512 KB
Chip lithography	65 nm	45 nm
Die size	143 mm²	no data
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	no data
Number of transistors	291 Million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 575 and V-Series V140 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	PPGA478	S1
Power consumption (TDP)	31 Watt	25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 575 and V-Series V140. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	no data	MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization
VirusProtect	-	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 575 and V-Series V140 are enumerated here.

AMD-V

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 575 and V-Series V140. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types

no data

DDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron M 575 0.25

V-Series V140 0.27
+8%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Celeron M 575 1917
+0.2%

V-Series V140 1913

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Celeron M 575 898

V-Series V140 990
+10.2%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.25	0.27
Recency	1 June 2008	4 October 2010
Chip lithography	65 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	31 Watt	25 Watt

V-Series V140 has a 8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 24% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron M 575 and V-Series V140.

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 575 and V-Series V140, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.