E1-2100 vs Celeron M 575

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 575 and E1-2100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Celeron MAMD E-Series
Architecture codenameMerom (2006−2008)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date1 June 2008 (16 years ago)23 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86no data
Current price$235 (2.7x MSRP)$172

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 575 and E1-2100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads12
Boost clock speed2 GHz1 GHz
Bus support667 MHzno data
L2 cache1 MB1024 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm28 nm
Die size143 mm2246 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
Number of transistors291 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 575 and E1-2100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478FT3
Power consumption (TDP)31 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 575 and E1-2100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR3L-1333 RAM, PCIe 3 [?], MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, BMI1, ABM, SVM, AES-NI
AES-NIno data+
FMAno dataFMA4
AVXno data+
PowerTuneno data-
TrueAudiono data-
PowerNowno data+
PowerGatingno data+
Out-of-band client managementno data-
VirusProtectno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 575 and E1-2100 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
IOMMU 2.0no data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 575 and E1-2100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 8210
Endurono data+
Switchable graphicsno data1
UVDno data+
VCEno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron M 575 and E1-2100 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPortno data+
HDMIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Celeron M 575 and E1-2100 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkanno data1

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron M 575 and E1-2100.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Celeron M 575 1917
+151%
E1-2100 765

Celeron M 575 outperforms E1-2100 by 151% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron M 575 1917
+33.6%
E1-2100 1435

Celeron M 575 outperforms E1-2100 by 34% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Celeron M 575 898
+16.3%
E1-2100 772

Celeron M 575 outperforms E1-2100 by 16% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2008 23 May 2013
Physical cores 1 2
Threads 1 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 31 Watt 9 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron M 575 and E1-2100. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 575 and E1-2100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron M 575
Celeron M 575
AMD E1-2100
E1-2100

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 9 votes

Rate Celeron M 575 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 296 votes

Rate E1-2100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron M 575 or E1-2100, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.