Celeron M 575 vs A10 Pro-7350B

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron M 575 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2222not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD KaveriIntel Celeron M
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date4 June 2014 (10 years ago)1 June 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$86
Current price$338 $235 (2.7x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron M 575 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed2.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz2 GHz
Bus supportno data667 MHz
L2 cache4096 KB1 MB
Chip lithography28 nm65 nm
Die size245 mm2143 mm2
Number of transistors2410 Million291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron M 575 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketFP3PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)19 Watt31 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron M 575. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1600 Controllerno data
AES-NI+no data
FMA+no data
AVX+no data
FRTC1no data
PowerTune-no data
TrueAudio+no data
PowerNow+no data
PowerGating+no data
Out-of-band client management+no data
VirusProtect+no data
RAID+no data
HSA1no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron M 575 are enumerated here.

AMD-V1no data
IOMMU 2.0+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron M 575. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-1600no data
Max memory channels2no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R6 Graphicsno data
iGPU core count6no data
Number of pipelines384no data
Enduro+no data
Switchable graphics1no data
UVD+no data
VCE+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron M 575 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron M 575 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXDirectX® 12no data
Vulkan1no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron M 575.

PCIe version3.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

A10 Pro-7350B 2004
+4.5%
Celeron M 575 1917

A10 Pro-7350B outperforms Celeron M 575 by 5% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A10 Pro-7350B 5276
+175%
Celeron M 575 1917

A10 Pro-7350B outperforms Celeron M 575 by 175% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

A10 Pro-7350B 2525
+181%
Celeron M 575 898

A10 Pro-7350B outperforms Celeron M 575 by 181% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 4 June 2014 1 June 2008
Physical cores 4 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 19 Watt 31 Watt

We couldn't decide between A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron M 575. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between A10 Pro-7350B and Celeron M 575, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD A10 Pro-7350B
A10 Pro-7350B
Intel Celeron M 575
Celeron M 575

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 31 vote

Rate A10 Pro-7350B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 9 votes

Rate Celeron M 575 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A10 Pro-7350B or Celeron M 575, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.