AMD A9-9425 vs Intel Celeron 2970M
Comparing A9-9425 and Celeron 2970M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture and sales start time and price.
A9-9425 and Celeron 2970M quantitative parameters such as cores and threads number, clocks, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of A9-9425 and Celeron 2970M performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Number of cores
Number of threads
Manufacturing process technology
Maximum core temperature
64 bit support
Information on A9-9425 and Celeron 2970M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Max number of CPUs in a configuration
Power consumption (TDP)
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9425 and Celeron 2970M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions
Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)
A9-9425 and Celeron 2970M technologies aimed at raising security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9425 and Celeron 2970M are enumerated here.
Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by A9-9425 and Celeron 2970M.
Supported memory types
Maximum memory size
Max memory channels
Maximum memory bandwidth
General parameters of GPUs integrated into A9-9425 and Celeron 2970M.
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 800 MHz)
Intel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequency
Available interfaces and connections of A9-9425 and Celeron 2970M integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A9-9425 and Celeron 2970M.
Max number of PCIe lanes
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of A9-9425 and Celeron 2970M. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
A9-9425 1.90 +1.6%
Celeron 2970M 1.87
Celeron 2970M 2489 +7.6%
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Celeron 2970M 3222 +20%
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Celeron 2970M 6248 +44%
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
Celeron 2970M 1 +6.7%
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
Celeron 2970M 2 +26.7%
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
Celeron 2970M 85 +11.8%
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
Celeron 2970M 164 +31.2%
A9-9425 26 +29.7%
Celeron 2970M 34
Celeron 2970M 1410 +58.2%
x264 encoding pass 1
Celeron 2970M 63 +23.5%
x264 encoding pass 2
Celeron 2970M 12 +20%
A9-9425 1 +400%
Celeron 2970M 0
A9-9425 1546 +1.7%
Celeron 2970M 1520
Let's see how good A9-9425 and Celeron 2970M are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately.
Advantages of AMD A9-9425
1.6% faster in synthetic tests
Much newer (1 June 2016 vs 14 April 2014)
Less power hungry (10 vs 37 watts)
Advantages of Intel Celeron 2970M
Finer manufacturing process technology (22 vs 28 nm)
Thermal Monitoring Technologies
So, A9-9425 or Celeron 2970M?
Technical City couldn't decide between AMD A9-9425 and Intel Celeron 2970M. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9425 and Celeron 2970M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.