A8-5545M vs Celeron 2970M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Celeron 2970M
2014
2 cores / 2 threads
0.97

A8-5545M outperforms Celeron 2970M by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron 2970M and A8-5545M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking23722349
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel CeleronAMD A-Series
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Richland (2013−2014)
Release date14 April 2014 (10 years ago)1 June 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75no data
Current price$59 (0.8x MSRP)$504

Detailed specifications

Celeron 2970M and A8-5545M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.2 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.7 GHz
L1 cache128 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size130 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data71 °C
Number of transistors960 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron 2970M and A8-5545M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCPGA946FP2
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron 2970M and A8-5545M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.286x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA, DDR3-1333 Controller
AES-NI-+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron 2970M and A8-5545M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection-no data
Anti-Theft-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron 2970M and A8-5545M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron 2970M and A8-5545M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for 4th Generation Intel® ProcessorsAMD Radeon HD 8510G
Quick Sync Video+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Celeron 2970M and A8-5545M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
VGA+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron 2970M and A8-5545M.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron 2970M 0.97
A8-5545M 1.00
+3.1%

A8-5545M outperforms Celeron 2970M by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron 2970M 1501
A8-5545M 1543
+2.8%

A8-5545M outperforms Celeron 2970M by 3% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.97 1.00
Recency 14 April 2014 1 June 2013
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 25 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Celeron 2970M and A8-5545M.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron 2970M and A8-5545M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron 2970M
Celeron 2970M
AMD A8-5545M
A8-5545M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


This processor has no user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 2970M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 24 votes

Rate A8-5545M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron 2970M or A8-5545M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.