A9-9425: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregate performance score

A9-9425
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.73

A9-9425 provides poor benchmark performance at 1.73% of a leader's which is a 96-core EPYC 9655P.

Summary

AMD started A9-9425 sales 31 May 2016. This is a Stoney Ridge architecture notebook processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 2 cores and 2 threads, and is based on 28 nm manufacturing technology, with a maximum frequency of 3700 MHz and a locked multiplier.

Compatibility-wise, this is AMD Socket FT4 processor with a TDP of 15 Watt and a maximum temperature of 74 °C. It supports DDR4 memory.

Primary details

A9-9425 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in the ranking2043
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Market segmentLaptop
SeriesAMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency10.91of 100.00 (Core Ultra 7 164U)
Architecture codenameStoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date31 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)
Threads2
Base clock speed3.1 GHzof 4.7 GHz (Ryzen 9 7900X)
Boost clock speed3.7 GHzof 6.2 GHz (Core i9-14900KS)
L1 cache128K (per core)of 80 KB (EPYC 9965)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)of 2 MB (Xeon 6980P)
L3 cache0 KBof 1152 MB (EPYC 9684X)
Chip lithography28 nmof 3 nm (Core Ultra 9 285K)
Die size124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cof 110 °C (Core Ultra 9 185H)
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cof 105 °C (Core i7-5950HQ)
Number of transistors1,200 millionof 135,240 million (EPYC 9684X)
64 bit support+
Windows 11 compatibility-

Compatibility

Information on A9-9425 compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1of 8 (Xeon Platinum 8454H)
SocketFT4
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattof 500 Watt (Xeon 6960P)

Technologies and extensions

Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by A9-9425. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND
AES-NI+
FMA+
AVX+

Virtualization technologies

Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.

AMD-V+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by A9-9425's memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of a GPU integrated into A9-9425.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 900 MHz)

Benchmark performance

Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of A9-9425. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

A9-9425 1.73

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

A9-9425 1512

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

A9-9425 320

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

A9-9425 482

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

A9-9425 2686

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

A9-9425 4338

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

A9-9425 2314

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

A9-9425 2

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

A9-9425 125

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

A9-9425 76

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

A9-9425 0.9

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

A9-9425 1

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

A9-9425 891

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

A9-9425 10

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

A9-9425 51

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

A9-9425 3323

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

A9-9425 2039

Geekbench 2

A9-9425 4518

Gaming performance

Closest competitors

A9-9425's performance relative to its closest rivals among notebook CPUs.


Core i3-6157U 100.58
A8-7410 100
A9-9425 100
Core m3-7Y32 99.42

Intel equivalent

According to our data, the closest Intel alternative to A9-9425 is Core i5-8210Y, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 1 position in our ranking.

Here are some closest Intel rivals to A9-9425:

Similar processors

Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Recommended GPUs

People consider these graphics cards to be good for A9-9425, according to our PC configuration statistics.

These are the fastest graphics cards for A9-9425 in our user configuration statistics. There is a total of 6574 configurations using A9-9425 in our database.

RTX 4090 GeForce RTX 4090
0.6% (39/6574)
RTX 4070 Ti GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
0.05% (3/6574)
RX 7900 XTX Radeon RX 7900 XTX
0.02% (1/6574)
RTX 3090 Ti GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
0.1% (8/6574)
RX 6950 XT Radeon RX 6950 XT
0.03% (2/6574)
RTX 3080 Ti GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
0.05% (3/6574)
RTX 4070 GeForce RTX 4070
0.06% (4/6574)
RX 6900 XT Radeon RX 6900 XT
0.03% (2/6574)
RX 7900 GRE Radeon RX 7900 GRE
0.02% (1/6574)

All comparisons with A9-9425

Community ratings

Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.


3.5 1537 votes

Rate A9-9425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about A9-9425, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.