AMD A9-9425 vs A8-7410
Comparing A9-9425 and A8-7410 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture and sales start time and price.
A9-9425 and A8-7410 quantitative parameters such as cores and threads number, clocks, manufacturing process, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of A9-9425 and A8-7410 performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Number of cores
Number of threads
Manufacturing process technology
Maximum core temperature
64 bit support
Information on A9-9425 and A8-7410 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one.
Power consumption (TDP)
12 - 25 Watt
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by A9-9425 and A8-7410. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by A9-9425 and A8-7410 are enumerated here.
Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by A9-9425 and A8-7410.
Supported memory types
Max memory channels
General parameters of GPUs integrated into A9-9425 and A8-7410.
AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 800 MHz)
Available interfaces and connections of A9-9425 and A8-7410 integrated GPUs.
Graphics API support
APIs supported by A9-9425 and A8-7410 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by A9-9425 and A8-7410.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of A9-9425 and A8-7410. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
A8-7410 3.43 +76.8%
A8-7410 2936 +26.9%
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
A9-9425 2686 +40.1%
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
A8-7410 4665 +7.5%
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core
A9-9425 0.9 +47.5%
Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core
A8-7410 1.9 +26.7%
Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core
A9-9425 76 +46.2%
Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core
A8-7410 174 +39.2%
A9-9425 25.83 +4.5%
A8-7410 1292 +45%
x264 encoding pass 1
A9-9425 51 +10.9%
x264 encoding pass 2
A9-9425 10 +0%
Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core
A9-9425 2039 +62.3%
Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core
A8-7410 3687 +11%
A8-7410 2741 +77.3%
Let's see how good A9-9425 and A8-7410 are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately.
Advantages of AMD A9-9425
Much newer (1 June 2016 vs 7 May 2015)
Higher maximum frequency (3700 vs 2500 MHz)
Higher base frequency (3100 vs 2200 MHz)
Less power hungry (10 vs 12 watts)
Advantages of AMD A8-7410
76.8% faster (about 2 times) in synthetic tests
AES (Advanced Encryption Standard instructions set - hardware acceleration of AES encryption and decryption. Speeds up encryption software, e.g. Veracrypt)
AVX (Advanced Vector Extensions - a set of SIMD instructions working with 128- and 256-bit registers)
AMD64 (AMD CPUs 64-bit architecture. Almost identical to Intel 64, save for some little and rarely used nuances)
VT (Virtualization Technology - Intel's virtualization hardware acceleration. Speeds up work with virtual machines)
Enhanced Virus Protection (EVP)
Enduro (saves battery charge by automatically switching between an integrated and discrete AMD GPU depending on workload. Similar to NVIDIA Optimus)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
So, A9-9425 or A8-7410?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends AMD A8-7410.
Should you still have questions on choice between A9-9425 and A8-7410, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.