Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
2020
15 Watt
5.22

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 outperforms RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) by an impressive 64% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking602468
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency27.58no data
ArchitectureVega (2017−2020)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameVega RenoirTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2020 (5 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38496
Core clock speed400 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataDDR4
Shared memory++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_1DirectX 12_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 5.22
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 8.56
+64%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) 2793
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 5000
+79%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD20
−50%
30−35
+50%
1440p24
−45.8%
35−40
+45.8%
4K18
−50%
27−30
+50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 19
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%
Counter-Strike 2 52
−63.5%
85−90
+63.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
−61.5%
21−24
+61.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 15
−60%
24−27
+60%
Battlefield 5 22
−86.4%
40−45
+86.4%
Counter-Strike 2 34
−61.8%
55−60
+61.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
−60%
16−18
+60%
Far Cry 5 15
−107%
30−35
+107%
Fortnite 33
−69.7%
55−60
+69.7%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−57.7%
40−45
+57.7%
Forza Horizon 5 12
−50%
18−20
+50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−57.1%
30−35
+57.1%
Valorant 97
+7.8%
90−95
−7.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 9
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Battlefield 5 21
−95.2%
40−45
+95.2%
Counter-Strike 2 14
−50%
21−24
+50%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 56
−152%
140−150
+152%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
−42.9%
10−11
+42.9%
Dota 2 42
−59.5%
65−70
+59.5%
Far Cry 5 16
−93.8%
30−35
+93.8%
Fortnite 22
−155%
55−60
+155%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−57.7%
40−45
+57.7%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−60%
24−27
+60%
Grand Theft Auto V 15
−133%
35−40
+133%
Metro Exodus 8
−138%
18−20
+138%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−57.1%
30−35
+57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
−56.3%
24−27
+56.3%
Valorant 73
−23.3%
90−95
+23.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 19
−116%
40−45
+116%
Cyberpunk 2077 8
−50%
12−14
+50%
Dota 2 40
−67.5%
65−70
+67.5%
Far Cry 5 16
−93.8%
30−35
+93.8%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−57.7%
40−45
+57.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
−57.1%
30−35
+57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
−127%
24−27
+127%
Valorant 19
−57.9%
30−33
+57.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
−64.7%
55−60
+64.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−55.6%
14−16
+55.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
−61.4%
70−75
+61.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8
−85.7%
12−14
+85.7%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−100%
10−11
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−62.2%
60−65
+62.2%
Valorant 49
−112%
100−110
+112%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−175%
21−24
+175%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−72.7%
18−20
+72.7%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−57.1%
21−24
+57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−50%
12−14
+50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−12
−72.7%
18−20
+72.7%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−17.6%
20−22
+17.6%
Metro Exodus 0−1 5−6
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Valorant 22
−123%
45−50
+123%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−267%
10−12
+267%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Dota 2 19
−78.9%
30−35
+78.9%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−100%
16−18
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%

This is how RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) and Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 compete in popular games:

  • Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 50% faster in 1080p
  • Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 46% faster in 1440p
  • Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 50% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is 8% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is ahead in 40 tests (98%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.22 8.56
Recency 7 January 2020 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm

RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7, on the other hand, has a 64% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 7 months.

The Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
Intel Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 716 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 16 votes

Rate Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) or Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.