GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs UHD Graphics 750
Aggregated performance score
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms UHD Graphics 750 by a whopping 315% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 622 | 281 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 46 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.08 | no data |
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) | Ampere (2020−2022) |
| GPU code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | GN20-S7 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 30 March 2021 (3 years ago) | 17 December 2021 (2 years ago) |
| Current price | $1454 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 256 | 2048 |
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1477 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm+++ | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30-45 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 20.80 | 189.1 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on UHD Graphics 750 and GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
| Laptop size | no data | large |
| Interface | Ring Bus | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | System Shared | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | System Shared | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | System Shared | 14000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 112.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | no data | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | no data | + |
| G-SYNC support | no data | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| VR Ready | no data | + |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| CUDA | no data | 8.6 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 10−12
−320%
| 42
+320%
|
| 1440p | 7−8
−343%
| 31
+343%
|
| 4K | 6−7
−367%
| 28
+367%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 8−9
−375%
|
35−40
+375%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 3−4
−1300%
|
42
+1300%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
−385%
|
60−65
+385%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 14−16
−220%
|
45−50
+220%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
−556%
|
59
+556%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 9−10
−456%
|
50−55
+456%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
−357%
|
60−65
+357%
|
| Hitman 3 | 10−11
−580%
|
68
+580%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
−388%
|
35−40
+388%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10
−244%
|
30−35
+244%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 12−14
−225%
|
35−40
+225%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 5−6
−820%
|
46
+820%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 8−9
−375%
|
35−40
+375%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 3−4
−600%
|
21
+600%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
−385%
|
60−65
+385%
|
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 14−16
−220%
|
45−50
+220%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
−489%
|
53
+489%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 9−10
−456%
|
50−55
+456%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
−357%
|
60−65
+357%
|
| Hitman 3 | 10−11
−460%
|
56
+460%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9
−388%
|
35−40
+388%
|
| Metro Exodus | 6−7
−400%
|
30−33
+400%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 9−10
−244%
|
30−35
+244%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 12−14
−225%
|
35−40
+225%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
−480%
|
58
+480%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 5−6
−680%
|
39
+680%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 8−9
−375%
|
35−40
+375%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 3−4
−133%
|
7
+133%
|
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
−385%
|
60−65
+385%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
−444%
|
49
+444%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 9−10
−456%
|
50−55
+456%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 14−16
−357%
|
60−65
+357%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
−240%
|
34
+240%
|
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 5−6
−260%
|
18
+260%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 7−8
−300%
|
27−30
+300%
|
| Hitman 3 | 8−9
−275%
|
30−33
+275%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−12
−127%
|
24−27
+127%
|
| Metro Exodus | 3−4
−467%
|
16−18
+467%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 3−4
−367%
|
14−16
+367%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 8−9
−200%
|
24−27
+200%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 2−3
−900%
|
20−22
+900%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 7−8
−429%
|
37
+429%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 3−4
−1067%
|
35−40
+1067%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6
−640%
|
35−40
+640%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 4−5
−400%
|
20−22
+400%
|
4K
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 3−4
−333%
|
12−14
+333%
|
| Hitman 3 | 4−5
−325%
|
16−18
+325%
|
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 7−8
−71.4%
|
12−14
+71.4%
|
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 2−3
−400%
|
10−11
+400%
|
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 1−2
−1100%
|
12−14
+1100%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−1800%
|
18−20
+1800%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 2−3
−450%
|
10−12
+450%
|
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 1−2
−800%
|
9−10
+800%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 5−6
−260%
|
18
+260%
|
| Far Cry New Dawn | 7−8
−157%
|
18−20
+157%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−1200%
|
24−27
+1200%
|
This is how UHD Graphics 750 and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:
- RTX 2050 Mobile is 320% faster in 1080p
- RTX 2050 Mobile is 343% faster in 1440p
- RTX 2050 Mobile is 367% faster in 4K
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2050 Mobile is 1800% faster than the UHD Graphics 750.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, RTX 2050 Mobile surpassed UHD Graphics 750 in all 56 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.48 | 18.57 |
| Recency | 30 March 2021 | 17 December 2021 |
| Maximum RAM amount | System Shared | 4 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 8 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30 Watt |
The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 750 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
