RTX A3000 Mobile vs Titan X Pascal

Place in performance ranking	147	151
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	15.04	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GP102	GA104
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	25 July 2016 (7 years ago)	12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,199	no data
Current price	$312 (0.3x MSRP)	no data

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	4096
Core clock speed	1418 MHz	1080 MHz
Boost clock speed	1531 MHz	1560 MHz
Number of transistors	11,800 million	17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	130 Watt (60 - 115 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	342.9	237.6
Floating-point performance	10,974 gflops	no data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Titan X Pascal and RTX A3000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	no data

Memory type	GDDR5X	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	10000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	480.4 GB/s	336.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data
G-SYNC support	+	no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	+	1.2
CUDA	+	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Titan X Pascal 33.65
+1.7%

RTX A3000 Mobile 33.10

Titan X Pascal outperforms RTX A3000 Mobile by 2% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Titan X Pascal 100948
+41.6%

RTX A3000 Mobile 71308

Titan X Pascal outperforms RTX A3000 Mobile by 42% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Titan X Pascal 35995
+38.5%

RTX A3000 Mobile 25990

Titan X Pascal outperforms RTX A3000 Mobile by 38% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Titan X Pascal 27316
+38.6%

RTX A3000 Mobile 19710

Titan X Pascal outperforms RTX A3000 Mobile by 39% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Titan X Pascal 135092
+350%

RTX A3000 Mobile 29996

Titan X Pascal outperforms RTX A3000 Mobile by 350% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	126 +27.3%	99 −27.3%
1440p	76 +65.2%	46 −65.2%
4K	59 +40.5%	42 −40.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

79
+2.6%

−2.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	104 +70.5%	60−65 −70.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	95 +20.3%	79 −20.3%
Battlefield 5	153 +51.5%	100−110 −51.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	155 +74.2%	85−90 −74.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	78 +18.2%	66 −18.2%
Far Cry 5	162 +45.9%	111 −45.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	150 +45.6%	103 −45.6%
Forza Horizon 4	127 +21%	100−110 −21%
Hitman 3	163 +11.6%	146 −11.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	107 +2.9%	104 −2.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	104 +96.2%	50−55 −96.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	136 +76.6%	75−80 −76.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	104 +11.8%	93 −11.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	87 +42.6%	60−65 −42.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	85 +25%	68 −25%
Battlefield 5	147 +45.5%	100−110 −45.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	123 +38.2%	85−90 −38.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	69 +30.2%	53 −30.2%
Far Cry 5	149 +44.7%	103 −44.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	140 +42.9%	98 −42.9%
Forza Horizon 4	121 +15.2%	100−110 −15.2%
Hitman 3	143 +15.3%	124 −15.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	84 −6%	89 +6%
Metro Exodus	96 +65.5%	55−60 −65.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	58 +9.4%	50−55 −9.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	114 +48.1%	75−80 −48.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	184 +21.9%	151 −21.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	91 +5.8%	86 −5.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	67 +9.8%	60−65 −9.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	63 +23.5%	51 −23.5%
Battlefield 5	137 +35.6%	100−110 −35.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	59 +37.2%	43 −37.2%
Far Cry 5	140 +50.5%	93 −50.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	127 +46%	87 −46%
Forza Horizon 4	112 +6.7%	100−110 −6.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	95 +55.7%	61 −55.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	64 +64.1%	39 −64.1%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	84 +58.5%	50−55 −58.5%
Hitman 3	87 +47.5%	55−60 −47.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60 +33.3%	45−50 −33.3%
Metro Exodus	58 +65.7%	35−40 −65.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	37 +42.3%	24−27 −42.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	78 +66%	45−50 −66%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +2.8%	35−40 −2.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	51 +45.7%	35−40 −45.7%
Battlefield 5	70−75 +1.4%	70−75 −1.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	38 +40.7%	27 −40.7%
Far Cry 5	101 +46.4%	69 −46.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	101 +60.3%	60−65 −60.3%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +1.4%	65−70 −1.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +2.3%	40−45 −2.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	46 +64.3%	27−30 −64.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	49 +75%	27−30 −75%
Hitman 3	47 +46.9%	30−35 −46.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	17 −41.2%	24−27 +41.2%
Metro Exodus	36 +63.6%	21−24 −63.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24 +33.3%	18−20 −33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	42 +68%	24−27 −68%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	68 +51.1%	45 −51.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	38 +72.7%	21−24 −72.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	32 +60%	20−22 −60%
Battlefield 5	71 +77.5%	40−45 −77.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	18 +80%	10−11 −80%
Far Cry 5	53 +47.2%	36 −47.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	56 +64.7%	30−35 −64.7%
Forza Horizon 4	73 +58.7%	45−50 −58.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	26 +62.5%	16−18 −62.5%

This is how Titan X Pascal and RTX A3000 Mobile compete in popular games:

Titan X Pascal is 27.3% faster than RTX A3000 Mobile in 1080p
Titan X Pascal is 65.2% faster than RTX A3000 Mobile in 1440p
Titan X Pascal is 40.5% faster than RTX A3000 Mobile in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Titan X Pascal is 96.2% faster than the RTX A3000 Mobile.
in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A3000 Mobile is 41.2% faster than the Titan X Pascal.

All in all, in popular games: