Apple M1 8-Core GPU vs TITAN RTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared TITAN RTX with M1 8-Core GPU, including specs and performance data.

TITAN RTX
2018
24 GB GDDR6, 280 Watt
49.04
+258%

TITAN RTX outperforms Apple M1 8-Core GPU by a whopping 258% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking64378
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.11no data
Power efficiency12.08no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)no data
GPU code nameTU102no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 December 2018 (6 years ago)10 November 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores46088
Core clock speed1350 MHz1278 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHzno data
Number of transistors18,600 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)280 Wattno data
Texture fill rate509.8no data
Floating-point processing power16.31 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs288no data
Tensor Cores576no data
Ray Tracing Cores72no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount24 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth672.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-Cno data
HDMI+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

TITAN RTX 49.04
+258%
Apple M1 8-Core GPU 13.71

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

TITAN RTX 537413
+91.8%
Apple M1 8-Core GPU 280200

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD162
+500%
27
−500%
1440p103
+281%
27−30
−281%
4K73
+306%
18−21
−306%

Cost per frame, $

1080p15.43no data
1440p24.26no data
4K34.23no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 166
+592%
24−27
−592%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+193%
27−30
−193%
Elden Ring 182
+344%
40−45
−344%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 85
+88.9%
45−50
−88.9%
Counter-Strike 2 141
+488%
24−27
−488%
Cyberpunk 2077 91
+237%
27−30
−237%
Forza Horizon 4 351
+538%
55−60
−538%
Metro Exodus 135
+265%
35−40
−265%
Red Dead Redemption 2 127
+274%
30−35
−274%
Valorant 246
+356%
50−55
−356%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 205
+356%
45−50
−356%
Counter-Strike 2 120
+400%
24−27
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 86
+219%
27−30
−219%
Dota 2 153
+212%
45−50
−212%
Elden Ring 209
+410%
40−45
−410%
Far Cry 5 104
+100%
50−55
−100%
Fortnite 185
+140%
75−80
−140%
Forza Horizon 4 286
+420%
55−60
−420%
Grand Theft Auto V 152
+210%
45−50
−210%
Metro Exodus 118
+219%
35−40
−219%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 248
+148%
100−105
−148%
Red Dead Redemption 2 93
+174%
30−35
−174%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+314%
40−45
−314%
Valorant 171
+217%
50−55
−217%
World of Tanks 270−280
+53.3%
180−190
−53.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75
+66.7%
45−50
−66.7%
Counter-Strike 2 110
+358%
24−27
−358%
Cyberpunk 2077 80
+196%
27−30
−196%
Dota 2 148
+202%
45−50
−202%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+106%
50−55
−106%
Forza Horizon 4 242
+340%
55−60
−340%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 192
+92%
100−105
−92%
Valorant 236
+337%
50−55
−337%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 114
+500%
18−20
−500%
Elden Ring 130
+519%
21−24
−519%
Grand Theft Auto V 114
+470%
20−22
−470%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+60.6%
100−110
−60.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 63
+425%
12−14
−425%
World of Tanks 300−350
+222%
95−100
−222%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+204%
27−30
−204%
Counter-Strike 2 74
+517%
12−14
−517%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
+520%
10−11
−520%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+381%
30−35
−381%
Forza Horizon 4 183
+455%
30−35
−455%
Metro Exodus 114
+293%
27−30
−293%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+453%
16−18
−453%
Valorant 192
+465%
30−35
−465%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 45
+400%
9−10
−400%
Dota 2 134
+458%
24−27
−458%
Elden Ring 70
+678%
9−10
−678%
Grand Theft Auto V 134
+458%
24−27
−458%
Metro Exodus 55
+511%
9−10
−511%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 197
+393%
40−45
−393%
Red Dead Redemption 2 41
+356%
9−10
−356%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 134
+458%
24−27
−458%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75
+477%
12−14
−477%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+500%
9−10
−500%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+700%
4−5
−700%
Dota 2 146
+508%
24−27
−508%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+371%
16−18
−371%
Fortnite 90
+500%
14−16
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 109
+474%
18−20
−474%
Valorant 105
+600%
14−16
−600%

This is how TITAN RTX and Apple M1 8-Core GPU compete in popular games:

  • TITAN RTX is 500% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN RTX is 281% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN RTX is 306% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the TITAN RTX is 700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, TITAN RTX surpassed Apple M1 8-Core GPU in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 49.04 13.71
Recency 18 December 2018 10 November 2020
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm

TITAN RTX has a 257.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Apple M1 8-Core GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The TITAN RTX is our recommended choice as it beats the M1 8-Core GPU in performance tests.

Be aware that TITAN RTX is a desktop card while Apple M1 8-Core GPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX
Apple M1 8-Core GPU
M1 8-Core GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 818 votes

Rate TITAN RTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 923 votes

Rate M1 8-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.