Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870

Aggregated performance score

RX Vega M GL / 870
2018
4 GB HBM2
14.39
+34.9%

Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 by a substantial 35% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking335396
Place by popularitynot in top-10016
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameVega Kaby Lake-GTiger Lake Xe
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2018 (6 years ago)15 August 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128096
Core clock speed931 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1011 MHzno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2DDR4
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Shared memory-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_1DirectX 12_1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega M GL / 870 14.39
+34.9%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 10.67

Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 by 35% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX Vega M GL / 870 9862
+47%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 6710

Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 by 47% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX Vega M GL / 870 7329
+52.1%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 4820

Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 by 52% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX Vega M GL / 870 38812
+2%
Iris Xe Graphics G7 38040

Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 by 2% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD44
+46.7%
30−35
−46.7%
1440p23
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
4K14
+40%
10−12
−40%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 47
+114%
21−24
−114%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Battlefield 5 62
+72.2%
35−40
−72.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 44
+57.1%
27−30
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Far Cry 5 42
+55.6%
27−30
−55.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 44
+51.7%
27−30
−51.7%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+34.2%
35−40
−34.2%
Hitman 3 35−40
+44.4%
27−30
−44.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+36.4%
21−24
−36.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 41
+78.3%
21−24
−78.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 39
+77.3%
21−24
−77.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Battlefield 5 52
+44.4%
35−40
−44.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 36
+28.6%
27−30
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Far Cry 5 39
+44.4%
27−30
−44.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 41
+41.4%
27−30
−41.4%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+34.2%
35−40
−34.2%
Hitman 3 35−40
+44.4%
27−30
−44.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
+36.4%
21−24
−36.4%
Metro Exodus 24
+50%
16−18
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 33
+43.5%
21−24
−43.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 41
+86.4%
21−24
−86.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 23
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+50%
16−18
−50%
Battlefield 5 48
+33.3%
35−40
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Far Cry 5 36
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 38
+31%
27−30
−31%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+34.2%
35−40
−34.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
+9.1%
21−24
−9.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21
+40%
14−16
−40%
Hitman 3 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Metro Exodus 14
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 19
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 17
+70%
10−11
−70%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Battlefield 5 34
+78.9%
18−20
−78.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Far Cry 5 24
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 27
+50%
18−20
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+47.4%
18−20
−47.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
Hitman 3 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9
+50%
6−7
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+75%
8−9
−75%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 11
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Battlefield 5 16
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 12
+50%
8−9
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 13
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+53.8%
12−14
−53.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%

This is how RX Vega M GL / 870 and Iris Xe Graphics G7 compete in popular games:

  • RX Vega M GL / 870 is 47% faster in 1080p
  • RX Vega M GL / 870 is 44% faster in 1440p
  • RX Vega M GL / 870 is 40% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX Vega M GL / 870 is 114% faster than the Iris Xe Graphics G7.
  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Iris Xe Graphics G7 is 13% faster than the RX Vega M GL / 870.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega M GL / 870 is ahead in 46 tests (98%)
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 is ahead in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.39 10.67
Recency 7 January 2018 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm

The Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 117 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2119 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.