RX 5600 XT vs RX Vega 56

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

RX Vega 56
34.34

RX 5600 XT outperforms RX Vega 56 by 3% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking142134
Place by popularitynot in top-10081
Value for money27.0422.42
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameVegaNavi 10
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date14 August 2017 (6 years old)21 January 2020 (4 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $279
Current price$224 (0.6x MSRP)$94 (0.3x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX Vega 56 has 21% better value for money than RX 5600 XT.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35842304
Core clock speed1138 MHz1235 MHz
Boost clock speed1474 MHz1750 MHz
Number of transistors12,500 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)210 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate329.5224.6
Floating-point performance10,566 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 8-pin1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB
Memory bus width409.6 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth409.6 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI++

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.1.1251.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX Vega 56 34.34
RX 5600 XT 35.35
+2.9%

RX 5600 XT outperforms RX Vega 56 by 3% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX Vega 56 13307
RX 5600 XT 13699
+2.9%

RX 5600 XT outperforms RX Vega 56 by 3% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX Vega 56 54586
RX 5600 XT 86004
+57.6%

RX 5600 XT outperforms RX Vega 56 by 58% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX Vega 56 29086
RX 5600 XT 31310
+7.6%

RX 5600 XT outperforms RX Vega 56 by 8% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX Vega 56 20759
RX 5600 XT 22058
+6.3%

RX 5600 XT outperforms RX Vega 56 by 6% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX Vega 56 125359
+8.2%
RX 5600 XT 115838

RX Vega 56 outperforms RX 5600 XT by 8% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

RX Vega 56 412820
RX 5600 XT 548796
+32.9%

RX 5600 XT outperforms RX Vega 56 by 33% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD116
+7.4%
108
−7.4%
1440p77
+24.2%
62
−24.2%
4K48
+29.7%
37
−29.7%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
−40.7%
83
+40.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 77
+20.3%
60−65
−20.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−53.3%
92
+53.3%
Battlefield 5 151
+42.5%
100−110
−42.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
−46.2%
136
+46.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
−25.4%
74
+25.4%
Far Cry 5 98
−51%
148
+51%
Far Cry New Dawn 96
−44.8%
139
+44.8%
Forza Horizon 4 141
−31.2%
185
+31.2%
Hitman 3 100−110
−30.6%
141
+30.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−54.1%
114
+54.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
−45.5%
80
+45.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 105
−20%
126
+20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−60%
104
+60%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 70
+9.4%
60−65
−9.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−26.7%
76
+26.7%
Battlefield 5 140
+32.1%
100−110
−32.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
−9.7%
102
+9.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
−6.8%
63
+6.8%
Far Cry 5 93
−45.2%
135
+45.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 93
−39.8%
130
+39.8%
Forza Horizon 4 134
−29.1%
173
+29.1%
Hitman 3 100−110
−15.7%
125
+15.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−16.2%
86
+16.2%
Metro Exodus 70
−15.7%
81
+15.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+3.8%
53
−3.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 91
−16.5%
106
+16.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 124
−12.9%
140
+12.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−36.9%
89
+36.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 52
−23.1%
60−65
+23.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−3.3%
62
+3.3%
Battlefield 5 131
+23.6%
100−110
−23.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+9.3%
54
−9.3%
Far Cry 5 89
−41.6%
126
+41.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 84
−40.5%
118
+40.5%
Forza Horizon 4 109
−26.6%
138
+26.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
−13.5%
84
+13.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
+85.7%
35
−85.7%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
−16.1%
65
+16.1%
Hitman 3 60−65
−30.6%
81
+30.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−14.9%
54
+14.9%
Metro Exodus 42
−16.7%
49
+16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−29.6%
35
+29.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 58
−8.6%
63
+8.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 44
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−21.6%
45
+21.6%
Battlefield 5 99
+30.3%
75−80
−30.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−15.4%
30
+15.4%
Far Cry 5 74
−20.3%
89
+20.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 74
−18.9%
88
+18.9%
Forza Horizon 4 88
−23.9%
109
+23.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−4.3%
45−50
+4.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+38.1%
21
−38.1%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+0%
30
+0%
Hitman 3 30−35
−32.4%
45
+32.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+78.6%
14
−78.6%
Metro Exodus 27
−11.1%
30
+11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−27.8%
23
+27.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 31
−6.5%
33
+6.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
−4.5%
46
+4.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+0%
21
+0%
Battlefield 5 55
+27.9%
40−45
−27.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−9.1%
12
+9.1%
Far Cry 5 39
−15.4%
45
+15.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 42
−9.5%
46
+9.5%
Forza Horizon 4 59
−18.6%
70
+18.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+54.5%
11
−54.5%

This is how RX Vega 56 and RX 5600 XT compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • RX Vega 56 is 7.4% faster than RX 5600 XT

1440p resolution:

  • RX Vega 56 is 24.2% faster than RX 5600 XT

4K resolution:

  • RX Vega 56 is 29.7% faster than RX 5600 XT

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX Vega 56 is 85.7% faster than the RX 5600 XT.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 5600 XT is 60% faster than the RX Vega 56.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX Vega 56 is ahead in 15 tests (22%)
  • RX 5600 XT is ahead in 51 test (75%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 34.34 35.35
Recency 14 August 2017 21 January 2020
Cost $399 $279
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 210 Watt 150 Watt

We couldn't decide between Radeon RX Vega 56 and Radeon RX 5600 XT. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
Radeon RX Vega 56
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
Radeon RX 5600 XT

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 658 votes

Rate AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2188 votes

Rate AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.