NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 6800M

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

RX 6800M
34.22
+34.1%

Radeon RX 6800M outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by 34% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking143193
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 2 (2020−2022)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 22GA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 June 2021 (2 years old)12 April 2021 (2 years old)

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602560
Core clock speed2116 MHz893 MHz
Boost clock speed2300 MHz1687 MHz
Number of transistors17,200 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)145 Watt95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate413.0108.6

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon RX 6800M and RTX A2000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed16000 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.2
CUDAno data8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6800M 34.22
+34.1%
RTX A2000 Mobile 25.52

Radeon RX 6800M outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by 34% in our combined benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 6800M 77244
+21.2%
RTX A2000 Mobile 63738

Radeon RX 6800M outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by 21% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 6800M 40391
+124%
RTX A2000 Mobile 18058

Radeon RX 6800M outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by 124% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 6800M 34199
+160%
RTX A2000 Mobile 13157

Radeon RX 6800M outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by 160% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 6800M 160859
+167%
RTX A2000 Mobile 60336

Radeon RX 6800M outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by 167% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RX 6800M 118
+22.4%
RTX A2000 Mobile 96

Radeon RX 6800M outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by 22% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RX 6800M 131
RTX A2000 Mobile 142
+8.9%

RTX A2000 Mobile outperforms Radeon RX 6800M by 9% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RX 6800M 39
RTX A2000 Mobile 110
+182%

RTX A2000 Mobile outperforms Radeon RX 6800M by 182% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RX 6800M 181
+33.8%
RTX A2000 Mobile 135

Radeon RX 6800M outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by 34% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RX 6800M 101
RTX A2000 Mobile 116
+15.2%

RTX A2000 Mobile outperforms Radeon RX 6800M by 15% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RX 6800M 60
+32.2%
RTX A2000 Mobile 45

Radeon RX 6800M outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by 32% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RX 6800M 141
+101%
RTX A2000 Mobile 70

Radeon RX 6800M outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by 101% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

RX 6800M 3
RTX A2000 Mobile 11
+269%

RTX A2000 Mobile outperforms Radeon RX 6800M by 269% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD107
+35.4%
79
−35.4%
1440p70
+70.7%
41
−70.7%
4K43
+13.2%
38
−13.2%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 123
+66.2%
74
−66.2%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+26%
50−55
−26%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 109
+98.2%
55
−98.2%
Battlefield 5 143
+74.4%
80−85
−74.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
+38.8%
65−70
−38.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 110
+77.4%
62
−77.4%
Far Cry 5 106
+10.4%
96
−10.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 96
+33.3%
72
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+27.1%
85−90
−27.1%
Hitman 3 100−110
+30.1%
83
−30.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+7.2%
69
−7.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 122
+198%
40−45
−198%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120
+81.8%
66
−81.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85
+37.1%
62
−37.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+26%
50−55
−26%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 90
+131%
39
−131%
Battlefield 5 141
+72%
80−85
−72%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 90−95
+38.8%
65−70
−38.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 102
+104%
50
−104%
Far Cry 5 102
+15.9%
88
−15.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 94
+32.4%
71
−32.4%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+27.1%
85−90
−27.1%
Hitman 3 100−110
+42.1%
76
−42.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 47
−21.3%
57
+21.3%
Metro Exodus 105
+139%
44
−139%
Red Dead Redemption 2 86
+110%
40−45
−110%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 109
+81.7%
60
−81.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 188
+95.8%
96
−95.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 79
+54.9%
51
−54.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 60−65
+26%
50−55
−26%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 78
+144%
32
−144%
Battlefield 5 139
+69.5%
80−85
−69.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 98
+139%
41
−139%
Far Cry 5 95
+14.5%
83
−14.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 82
+39%
59
−39%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+27.1%
85−90
−27.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 109
+118%
50
−118%
Watch Dogs: Legion 69
+138%
29
−138%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
+41%
35−40
−41%
Hitman 3 60−65
+27.1%
48
−27.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+14.6%
41
−14.6%
Metro Exodus 59
+119%
27
−119%
Red Dead Redemption 2 53
+179%
18−20
−179%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 81
+103%
40
−103%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+32.1%
27−30
−32.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 63
+133%
27
−133%
Battlefield 5 130
+128%
55−60
−128%
Cyberpunk 2077 51
+104%
25
−104%
Far Cry 5 100
+88.7%
53
−88.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 83
+69.4%
49
−69.4%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+38.5%
50−55
−38.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+51.6%
30−35
−51.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55
+175%
20
−175%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
+50%
20−22
−50%
Hitman 3 30−35
+41.7%
24−27
−41.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+47.1%
16−18
−47.1%
Metro Exodus 38
+138%
16−18
−138%
Red Dead Redemption 2 33
+136%
14−16
−136%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 43
+153%
17
−153%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+81.8%
33
−81.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+43.8%
16−18
−43.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 38
+171%
14−16
−171%
Battlefield 5 82
+173%
30−33
−173%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+283%
6−7
−283%
Far Cry 5 61
+135%
26
−135%
Far Cry New Dawn 64
+156%
24−27
−156%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+33.3%
35−40
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 33
+175%
12−14
−175%

This is how RX 6800M and RTX A2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • RX 6800M is 35.4% faster than RTX A2000 Mobile

1440p resolution:

  • RX 6800M is 70.7% faster than RTX A2000 Mobile

4K resolution:

  • RX 6800M is 13.2% faster than RTX A2000 Mobile

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6800M is 283% faster than the RTX A2000 Mobile.
  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX A2000 Mobile is 21.3% faster than the RX 6800M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6800M is ahead in 67 tests (99%)
  • RTX A2000 Mobile is ahead in 1 test (1%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 34.22 25.52
Recency 1 June 2021 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 145 Watt 95 Watt

The Radeon RX 6800M is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A2000 Mobile in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6800M
Radeon RX 6800M
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
RTX A2000 Mobile

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 285 votes

Rate AMD Radeon RX 6800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 84 votes

Rate NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.