Radeon RX 6650M vs RTX A2000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

RTX A2000 Mobile
2021
8 GB GDDR6
25.51

Radeon RX 6650M outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by an impressive 50% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking194110
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2022)RDNA 2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGA107Navi 23
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25601792
Core clock speed893 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1687 MHz2222 MHz
Number of transistors13,250 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)120 Watt
Texture fill rate108.6270.6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on RTX A2000 Mobile and Radeon RX 6650M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth176.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.1
Vulkan1.21.2
CUDA8.6no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX A2000 Mobile 25.51
RX 6650M 38.38
+50.5%

Radeon RX 6650M outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by 50% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RTX A2000 Mobile 18058
RX 6650M 32846
+81.9%

Radeon RX 6650M outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by 82% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RTX A2000 Mobile 13157
RX 6650M 25739
+95.6%

Radeon RX 6650M outperforms RTX A2000 Mobile by 96% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD79
−46.8%
116
+46.8%
1440p41
−46.3%
60−65
+46.3%
4K38
−44.7%
55−60
+44.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 74
−71.6%
127
+71.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−36%
65−70
+36%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55
−21.8%
65−70
+21.8%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−36.6%
110−120
+36.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
−56.7%
100−110
+56.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
−71%
106
+71%
Far Cry 5 96
−1%
95−100
+1%
Far Cry New Dawn 72
−27.8%
90−95
+27.8%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−38.8%
110−120
+38.8%
Hitman 3 83
−116%
179
+116%
Horizon Zero Dawn 69
−20.3%
80−85
+20.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−51.2%
60−65
+51.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 66
−39.4%
90−95
+39.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 62
−67.7%
104
+67.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−36%
65−70
+36%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 39
−71.8%
65−70
+71.8%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−36.6%
110−120
+36.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
−56.7%
100−110
+56.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
−58%
79
+58%
Far Cry 5 88
−10.2%
95−100
+10.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 71
−29.6%
90−95
+29.6%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−38.8%
110−120
+38.8%
Hitman 3 76
−112%
161
+112%
Horizon Zero Dawn 57
−45.6%
80−85
+45.6%
Metro Exodus 44
−95.5%
86
+95.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−51.2%
60−65
+51.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60
−53.3%
90−95
+53.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 96
−74%
167
+74%
Watch Dogs: Legion 51
−84.3%
94
+84.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−36%
65−70
+36%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 32
−109%
65−70
+109%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−36.6%
110−120
+36.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
−56.1%
64
+56.1%
Far Cry 5 83
−16.9%
95−100
+16.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 59
−55.9%
90−95
+55.9%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−38.8%
110−120
+38.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
−80%
90
+80%
Watch Dogs: Legion 29
−114%
62
+114%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−61.5%
60−65
+61.5%
Hitman 3 48
−47.9%
70−75
+47.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 41
−31.7%
50−55
+31.7%
Metro Exodus 27
−55.6%
40−45
+55.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−63.2%
30−35
+63.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40
−42.5%
55−60
+42.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−50%
40−45
+50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27
−55.6%
40−45
+55.6%
Battlefield 5 55−60
−42.1%
80−85
+42.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
−20%
30−33
+20%
Far Cry 5 53
−32.1%
70−75
+32.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 49
−46.9%
70−75
+46.9%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−55.8%
80−85
+55.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−77.4%
55−60
+77.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20
−70%
30−35
+70%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
−75%
35−40
+75%
Hitman 3 24−27
−58.3%
35−40
+58.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−70.6%
27−30
+70.6%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−62.5%
24−27
+62.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−42.9%
20−22
+42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
−39.4%
45−50
+39.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−62.5%
24−27
+62.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−56.7%
45−50
+56.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−117%
12−14
+117%
Far Cry 5 26
−38.5%
35−40
+38.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−60%
40−45
+60%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−50%
50−55
+50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
−66.7%
20−22
+66.7%

This is how RTX A2000 Mobile and RX 6650M compete in popular games:

  • RX 6650M is 47% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6650M is 46% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6650M is 45% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6650M is 117% faster than the RTX A2000 Mobile.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6650M surpassed RTX A2000 Mobile in all 68 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.51 38.38
Recency 12 April 2021 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 8 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 120 Watt

The Radeon RX 6650M is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX A2000 Mobile in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile
RTX A2000 Mobile
AMD Radeon RX 6650M
Radeon RX 6650M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 86 votes

Rate RTX A2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 71 vote

Rate Radeon RX 6650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.