RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs Radeon RX 6750 XT

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 6750 XT with RTX 6000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

RX 6750 XT
2022
12 GB GDDR6, 250 Watt
51.97

RTX 6000 Ada Generation outperforms RX 6750 XT by a substantial 38% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5519
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation52.018.05
Power efficiency14.7116.95
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 22AD102
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date3 March 2022 (3 years ago)3 December 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$549 $6,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 6750 XT has 546% better value for money than RTX 6000 Ada Generation.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256018176
Core clock speed2150 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speed2600 MHz2505 MHz
Number of transistors17,200 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate416.01,423
Floating-point processing power13.31 TFLOPS91.06 TFLOPS
ROPs64192
TMUs160568
Tensor Coresno data568
Ray Tracing Cores40142

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB48 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed2250 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth432.0 GB/s960.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a4x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 6750 XT 51.97
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 71.85
+38.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6750 XT 20763
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 28703
+38.2%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RX 6750 XT 48327
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 70850
+46.6%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 6750 XT 104004
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 126448
+21.6%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RX 6750 XT 37609
+2.5%
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 36679

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD163
−12.3%
183
+12.3%
1440p88
−81.8%
160
+81.8%
4K50
−118%
109
+118%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.37
+1003%
37.15
−1003%
1440p6.24
+581%
42.49
−581%
4K10.98
+468%
62.38
−468%
  • RX 6750 XT has 1003% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6750 XT has 581% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6750 XT has 468% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 353
+9.6%
300−350
−9.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 165
−6.1%
170−180
+6.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 171
+6.9%
160−170
−6.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 150−160
−19.1%
180−190
+19.1%
Counter-Strike 2 346
+7.5%
300−350
−7.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 127
−37.8%
170−180
+37.8%
Far Cry 5 178
+36.9%
130
−36.9%
Fortnite 210−220
−39.8%
300−350
+39.8%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
−44.3%
270−280
+44.3%
Forza Horizon 5 217
+9.6%
190−200
−9.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 141
−13.5%
160−170
+13.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−0.6%
170−180
+0.6%
Valorant 270−280
−45.8%
400−450
+45.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 150−160
−19.1%
180−190
+19.1%
Counter-Strike 2 220
−46.4%
300−350
+46.4%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 109
−60.6%
170−180
+60.6%
Dota 2 154
−36.4%
210−220
+36.4%
Far Cry 5 170
+34.9%
126
−34.9%
Fortnite 210−220
−39.8%
300−350
+39.8%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
−44.3%
270−280
+44.3%
Forza Horizon 5 186
−6.5%
190−200
+6.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 162
−5.6%
170−180
+5.6%
Hogwarts Legacy 106
−50.9%
160−170
+50.9%
Metro Exodus 127
+11.4%
114
−11.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−0.6%
170−180
+0.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 245
−99.6%
489
+99.6%
Valorant 270−280
−45.8%
400−450
+45.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 150−160
−19.1%
180−190
+19.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 98
−78.6%
170−180
+78.6%
Dota 2 131
−37.4%
180−190
+37.4%
Far Cry 5 158
+33.9%
118
−33.9%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
−44.3%
270−280
+44.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 79
−103%
160−170
+103%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−0.6%
170−180
+0.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 135
−92.6%
260
+92.6%
Valorant 270−280
−45.8%
400−450
+45.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 210−220
−39.8%
300−350
+39.8%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 126
−70.6%
210−220
+70.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400
−45.8%
500−550
+45.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 106
−35.8%
140−150
+35.8%
Metro Exodus 76
−25%
95
+25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
−57.5%
450−500
+57.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
−46.7%
170−180
+46.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 60
−70%
100−110
+70%
Far Cry 5 141
+19.5%
118
−19.5%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
−57.1%
240−250
+57.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 58
−63.8%
95−100
+63.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
−103%
219
+103%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 130−140
−9.4%
150−160
+9.4%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 33
−21.2%
40
+21.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 104
−61.5%
160−170
+61.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
−63.6%
50−55
+63.6%
Metro Exodus 47
−91.5%
90
+91.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
−133%
184
+133%
Valorant 290−300
−13%
300−350
+13%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
−60.2%
130−140
+60.2%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
−54%
95−100
+54%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
−88.5%
45−50
+88.5%
Dota 2 101
−28.7%
130−140
+28.7%
Far Cry 5 78
−47.4%
115
+47.4%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−84.1%
190−200
+84.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 31
−74.2%
50−55
+74.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−17.1%
95−100
+17.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75
−9.7%
75−80
+9.7%

This is how RX 6750 XT and RTX 6000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 12% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 82% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 118% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 6750 XT is 37% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 133% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6750 XT is ahead in 9 tests (14%)
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is ahead in 52 tests (83%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 51.97 71.85
Recency 3 March 2022 3 December 2022
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 300 Watt

RX 6750 XT has 20% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 38.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 6750 XT in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 6750 XT is a desktop card while RTX 6000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
Radeon RX 6750 XT
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 2812 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 106 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 6750 XT or RTX 6000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.