Radeon RX 6750 XT vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Place in the ranking	49	47
Place by popularity	23	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	69.11	51.88
Power efficiency	18.21	14.82
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GA104	Navi 22
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	1 December 2020 (4 years ago)	3 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$399	$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3060 Ti has 33% better value for money than RX 6750 XT.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4864	2560
Core clock speed	1410 MHz	2150 MHz
Boost clock speed	1665 MHz	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	17,400 million	17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	200 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	253.1	416.0
Floating-point processing power	16.2 TFLOPS	13.31 TFLOPS
ROPs	80	64
TMUs	152	160
Tensor Cores	152	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	38	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	242 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 12-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	432.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	8.6	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3060 Ti 53.12

RX 6750 XT 54.05
+1.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 3060 Ti 20469

RX 6750 XT 20826
+1.7%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3060 Ti 37941

RX 6750 XT 48327
+27.4%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 3060 Ti 78597

RX 6750 XT 104004
+32.3%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3060 Ti 28145

RX 6750 XT 37609
+33.6%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3060 Ti 153968

RX 6750 XT 170993
+11.1%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3060 Ti 615311
+16.2%

RX 6750 XT 529598

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	141 −15.6%	163 +15.6%
1440p	78 −9%	85 +9%
4K	48 −2.1%	49 +2.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.83	3.37
1440p	5.12	6.46
4K	8.31	11.20

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

−98.8%

165
+98.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	121 +8%	110−120 −8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	95 +1.1%	90−95 −1.1%
Battlefield 5	160−170 −1.2%	170−180 +1.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−110 −1%	100−110 +1%
Cyberpunk 2077	81 −56.8%	127 +56.8%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 −0.8%	130−140 +0.8%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 −0.5%	210−220 +0.5%
Hitman 3	110−120 −0.9%	110−120 +0.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	200−210 −1%	200−210 +1%
Metro Exodus	140−150 −0.7%	150−160 +0.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 −0.9%	110−120 +0.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	200−210 −1.4%	210−220 +1.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	196 +75%	110−120 −75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	81 −16%	90−95 +16%
Battlefield 5	160−170 −1.2%	170−180 +1.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−110 −1%	100−110 +1%
Cyberpunk 2077	78 −39.7%	109 +39.7%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	120−130 −0.8%	130−140 +0.8%
Forza Horizon 4	210−220 −0.5%	210−220 +0.5%
Hitman 3	110−120 −0.9%	110−120 +0.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	200−210 −1%	200−210 +1%
Metro Exodus	140−150 −0.7%	150−160 +0.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	110−120 −0.9%	110−120 +0.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	192 −58.3%	304 +58.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 −1.8%	110−120 +1.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75 −49.3%	110−120 +49.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	74 −27%	90−95 +27%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−110 −1%	100−110 +1%
Cyberpunk 2077	77 −27.3%	98 +27.3%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	173 −26.6%	210−220 +26.6%
Hitman 3	110−120 −0.9%	110−120 +0.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	140 −50%	210 +50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	174 −49.4%	260 +49.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	92 −46.7%	135 +46.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	77 −27.3%	98 +27.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

110−120

−0.9%

110−120
+0.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	110−120 −1.8%	110−120 +1.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 −1.2%	80−85 +1.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65 +6.6%	60−65 −6.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60 −6.7%	60−65 +6.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65 −1.6%	60−65 +1.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	52 −15.4%	60 +15.4%
Far Cry 5	60−65 −1.6%	60−65 +1.6%
Forza Horizon 4	260−270 −0.4%	260−270 +0.4%
Hitman 3	70−75 −1.4%	75−80 +1.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	114 −38.6%	158 +38.6%
Metro Exodus	93 −35.5%	126 +35.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	139 −33.8%	186 +33.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85−90 −1.1%	85−90 +1.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	247 +10.3%	220−230 −10.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

90−95

−1.1%

90−95
+1.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 −1.7%	55−60 +1.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −2%	50−55 +2%
Hitman 3	57 +26.7%	45−50 −26.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	210−220 −0.5%	210−220 +0.5%
Metro Exodus	75−80 −1.3%	75−80 +1.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	77 −2.6%	79 +2.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45 +12.5%	40−45 −12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40 +5.3%	35−40 −5.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −2.7%	35−40 +2.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	25 −4%	26 +4%
Far Cry 5	30−35 −2.9%	35−40 +2.9%
Forza Horizon 4	103 +28.8%	80−85 −28.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	84 −17.9%	99 +17.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	33 −24.2%	41 +24.2%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55

−2%

50−55
+2%

This is how RTX 3060 Ti and RX 6750 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6750 XT is 16% faster in 1080p
RX 6750 XT is 9% faster in 1440p
RX 6750 XT is 2% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3060 Ti is 75% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX 6750 XT is 99% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 3060 Ti is ahead in 9 tests (13%)
RX 6750 XT is ahead in 58 tests (81%)
there's a draw in 5 tests (7%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	53.12	54.05
Recency	1 December 2020	3 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	200 Watt	250 Watt

RTX 3060 Ti has 25% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 XT, on the other hand, has a 1.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 3060 Ti and Radeon RX 6750 XT.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.