Radeon 780M vs RX 6300M

Place in the ranking	329	304
Place by popularity	not in top-100	48
Power efficiency	32.80	84.13
Architecture	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Navi 24	Hawx Point
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	4 January 2022 (3 years ago)	6 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	768
Core clock speed	2000 MHz	800 MHz
Boost clock speed	2400 MHz	2700 MHz
Number of transistors	5,400 million	25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	115.2	129.6
Floating-point processing power	3.686 TFLOPS	8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	48	48
Ray Tracing Cores	12	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	32 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	2250 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	72 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 6300M 16.64

Radeon 780M 18.29
+9.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 6300M 6398

Radeon 780M 7032
+9.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	30−35 −16.7%	35 +16.7%
1440p	14−16 −21.4%	17 +21.4%
4K	12−14 −16.7%	14 +16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	27−30 −10.3%	32 +10.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −18.2%	39 +18.2%
Elden Ring	50−55 +40.5%	37 −40.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 −9.3%	55−60 +9.3%
Counter-Strike 2	27−30 +11.5%	26 −11.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +120%	15 −120%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +4.6%	65 −4.6%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +2.3%	44 −2.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −7.5%	40−45 +7.5%
Valorant	65−70 −10.4%	70−75 +10.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 −9.3%	55−60 +9.3%
Counter-Strike 2	27−30 +16%	25 −16%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +175%	12 −175%
Dota 2	60−65 +107%	29 −107%
Elden Ring	50−55 +23.8%	42 −23.8%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +84.4%	32 −84.4%
Fortnite	90−95 −8.8%	95−100 +8.8%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +25.9%	54 −25.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	55−60 +31.1%	45 −31.1%
Metro Exodus	45−50 +40.6%	32 −40.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 −7.7%	120−130 +7.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −7.5%	40−45 +7.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −11.8%	55−60 +11.8%
Valorant	65−70 −10.4%	70−75 +10.4%
World of Tanks	200−210 −5.8%	220−230 +5.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 −9.3%	55−60 +9.3%
Counter-Strike 2	27−30 −10.3%	30−35 +10.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 +175%	12 −175%
Dota 2	60−65 −8.3%	65−70 +8.3%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −6.8%	60−65 +6.8%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +47.8%	46 −47.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 −7.7%	120−130 +7.7%
Valorant	65−70 −10.4%	70−75 +10.4%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	24−27 +38.9%	18 −38.9%
Elden Ring	24−27 −15.4%	30−33 +15.4%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 +31.6%	19 −31.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 −7.8%	160−170 +7.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −6.7%	16−18 +6.7%
World of Tanks	110−120 −8.7%	120−130 +8.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −8.8%	35−40 +8.8%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −7.1%	14−16 +7.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −7.7%	14−16 +7.7%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −14.3%	45−50 +14.3%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +28.1%	32 −28.1%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −10.8%	40−45 +10.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +10%	20 −10%
Valorant	40−45 −11.9%	45−50 +11.9%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −16.7%	14−16 +16.7%
Dota 2	27−30 +38.1%	21 −38.1%
Elden Ring	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	27−30 +33.3%	21 −33.3%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 −12.2%	55−60 +12.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −9.1%	12−14 +9.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +33.3%	21 −33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −16.7%	14−16 +16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Dota 2	27−30 −6.9%	30−35 +6.9%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −9.5%	21−24 +9.5%
Fortnite	18−20 −10.5%	21−24 +10.5%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +41.2%	17 −41.2%
Valorant	18−20 −10.5%	21−24 +10.5%

This is how RX 6300M and Radeon 780M compete in popular games:

Radeon 780M is 17% faster in 1080p
Radeon 780M is 21% faster in 1440p
Radeon 780M is 17% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6300M is 175% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Radeon 780M is 18% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 6300M is ahead in 23 tests (37%)
Radeon 780M is ahead in 39 tests (62%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	16.64	18.29
Recency	4 January 2022	6 December 2023
Chip lithography	6 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	15 Watt

Radeon 780M has a 9.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon RX 6300M and Radeon 780M.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.