NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs AMD Radeon RX 590

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

RX 590
24.42
+20.2%

Radeon RX 590 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 by 20% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking205252
Place by popularitynot in top-1002
Value for money32.3719.08
ArchitecturePolaris (2016−2019)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code namePolaris 30TU117
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date15 November 2018 (5 years old)23 April 2019 (4 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 $149
Current price$133 (0.5x MSRP)$185 (1.2x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 590 has 70% better value for money than GTX 1650.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304896
Core clock speed1469 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistors5,700 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)175 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate222.593.24

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mm229 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed8000 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.0 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI++

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDAno data7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 590 24.42
+20.2%
GTX 1650 20.32

Radeon RX 590 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 by 20% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 590 9464
+20.2%
GTX 1650 7875

Radeon RX 590 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 by 20% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 590 48454
+8.4%
GTX 1650 44694

Radeon RX 590 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 by 8% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

RX 590 23363
+71.2%
GTX 1650 13645

Radeon RX 590 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 by 71% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 590 16814
+82.7%
GTX 1650 9203

Radeon RX 590 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 by 83% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

RX 590 86825
+71.8%
GTX 1650 50549

Radeon RX 590 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 by 72% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

RX 590 397712
+6.5%
GTX 1650 373333

Radeon RX 590 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 by 7% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max

This part of SPECviewperf 12 benchmark emulates work with 3DS Max, executing eleven tests in various use scenarios, including architectural modeling and animation for computer games.

Benchmark coverage: 1%

RX 590 120
+11.1%
GTX 1650 108

Radeon RX 590 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 by 11% in SPECviewperf 12 - 3ds Max.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD103
+47.1%
70
−47.1%
1440p60
+57.9%
38
−57.9%
4K37
+60.9%
23
−60.9%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+25%
30−35
−25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65
+22.6%
53
−22.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 86
+83%
47
−83%
Battlefield 5 133
+118%
61
−118%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 99
+30.3%
76
−30.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+25%
30−35
−25%
Far Cry 5 85
+25%
68
−25%
Far Cry New Dawn 88
+33.3%
66
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 120
+33.3%
90
−33.3%
Hitman 3 70−75
−4.1%
76
+4.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 73
+32.7%
55
−32.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 77
+48.1%
52
−48.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 78
+34.5%
58
−34.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 72
+28.6%
56
−28.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 54
+14.9%
47
−14.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 73
+109%
35
−109%
Battlefield 5 111
+109%
53
−109%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 81
+39.7%
58
−39.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+25%
30−35
−25%
Far Cry 5 79
+27.4%
62
−27.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 83
+33.9%
62
−33.9%
Forza Horizon 4 113
+36.1%
83
−36.1%
Hitman 3 70−75
+17.7%
62
−17.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55
+34.1%
41
−34.1%
Metro Exodus 52
+48.6%
35
−48.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 39
+39.3%
28
−39.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 71
+51.1%
47
−51.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 88
+18.9%
74
−18.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 59
+22.9%
48
−22.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 39
+56%
25
−56%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 62
+377%
13
−377%
Battlefield 5 100
+96.1%
51
−96.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+25%
30−35
−25%
Far Cry 5 74
+27.6%
58
−27.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 76
+33.3%
57
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 91
+40%
65
−40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+21.4%
42
−21.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35
+66.7%
21
−66.7%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 56
+55.6%
36
−55.6%
Hitman 3 40−45
+10.8%
37
−10.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 37
+42.3%
26
−42.3%
Metro Exodus 31
+55%
20
−55%
Red Dead Redemption 2 25
+47.1%
17
−47.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+13.8%
29
−13.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+44.4%
18
−44.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55
+323%
13
−323%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+41%
39
−41%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+7.7%
39
−7.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 58
+41.5%
41
−41.5%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+8.7%
46
−8.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+26.1%
21−24
−26.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 25
+78.6%
14
−78.6%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 31
+55%
20
−55%
Hitman 3 21−24
+21.1%
19
−21.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10
+25%
8
−25%
Metro Exodus 19
+58.3%
12
−58.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16
+45.5%
10−12
−45.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24
+84.6%
13
−84.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
+23.1%
26
−23.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 19
+46.2%
13
−46.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 42
+740%
5
−740%
Battlefield 5 40
+90.5%
21
−90.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Far Cry 5 24
+26.3%
19
−26.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 31
+47.6%
21
−47.6%
Forza Horizon 4 46
+53.3%
30
−53.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 13
+62.5%
8
−62.5%

This is how RX 590 and GTX 1650 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • RX 590 is 47.1% faster than GTX 1650

1440p resolution:

  • RX 590 is 57.9% faster than GTX 1650

4K resolution:

  • RX 590 is 60.9% faster than GTX 1650

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 590 is 740% faster than the GTX 1650.
  • in Hitman 3, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1650 is 4.1% faster than the RX 590.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 590 is ahead in 67 tests (99%)
  • GTX 1650 is ahead in 1 test (1%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 24.42 20.32
Recency 15 November 2018 23 April 2019
Cost $279 $149
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 175 Watt 75 Watt

The Radeon RX 590 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 590
Radeon RX 590
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 2034 votes

Rate AMD Radeon RX 590 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 20192 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.