Quadro P5000 vs Radeon RX 5600 XT

Place in performance ranking	134	159
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	22.42	10.05
Architecture	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	Navi 10	GP104
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	21 January 2020 (4 years ago)	1 October 2016 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$279	$2,499
Current price	$94 (0.3x MSRP)	$1270 (0.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5600 XT has 123% better value for money than Quadro P5000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	2048
Core clock speed	1235 MHz	1607 MHz
Boost clock speed	1750 MHz	1733 MHz
Number of transistors	10,300 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	224.6	277.3
Floating-point performance	no data	8,873 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	9016 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	192 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort
HDMI	+	no data
Display Port	no data	1.4

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	no data	+
3D Stereo	no data	+
Mosaic	no data	+
nView Display Management	no data	+
Optimus	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12
Shader Model	6.5	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
OpenCL	2.0	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5600 XT 35.33
+9.9%

Quadro P5000 32.14

Radeon RX 5600 XT outperforms Quadro P5000 by 10% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 5600 XT 13671
+9.9%

Quadro P5000 12438

Radeon RX 5600 XT outperforms Quadro P5000 by 10% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	108 +13.7%	95 −13.7%
1440p	62 +12.7%	55−60 −12.7%
4K	37 −10.8%	41 +10.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

83
+50.9%

55−60

−50.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 +6.7%	60−65 −6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	92 +64.3%	55−60 −64.3%
Battlefield 5	100−110 +8.2%	95−100 −8.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	136 +58.1%	85−90 −58.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	74 +34.5%	55−60 −34.5%
Far Cry 5	148 +78.3%	80−85 −78.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	139 +71.6%	80−85 −71.6%
Forza Horizon 4	185 +81.4%	100−110 −81.4%
Hitman 3	141 +41%	100−105 −41%
Horizon Zero Dawn	114 +65.2%	65−70 −65.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80 +53.8%	50−55 −53.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	126 +70.3%	70−75 −70.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	104 +70.5%	60−65 −70.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 +6.7%	60−65 −6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	76 +35.7%	55−60 −35.7%
Battlefield 5	100−110 +8.2%	95−100 −8.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	102 +18.6%	85−90 −18.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	63 +14.5%	55−60 −14.5%
Far Cry 5	135 +62.7%	80−85 −62.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	130 +60.5%	80−85 −60.5%
Forza Horizon 4	173 +69.6%	100−110 −69.6%
Hitman 3	125 +25%	100−105 −25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	86 +24.6%	65−70 −24.6%
Metro Exodus	81 +44.6%	55−60 −44.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	53 +1.9%	50−55 −1.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	106 +43.2%	70−75 −43.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	140 +42.9%	98 −42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	89 +45.9%	60−65 −45.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	60−65 +6.7%	60−65 −6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	62 +10.7%	55−60 −10.7%
Battlefield 5	100−110 +8.2%	95−100 −8.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	54 −1.9%	55−60 +1.9%
Far Cry 5	126 +51.8%	80−85 −51.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	118 +45.7%	80−85 −45.7%
Forza Horizon 4	138 +35.3%	100−110 −35.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	84 +58.5%	53 −58.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35 −74.3%	60−65 +74.3%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	65 +27.5%	50−55 −27.5%
Hitman 3	81 +42.1%	55−60 −42.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	54 +22.7%	40−45 −22.7%
Metro Exodus	49 +44.1%	30−35 −44.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35 +40%	24−27 −40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	63 +37%	45−50 −37%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +8.6%	35−40 −8.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45 +32.4%	30−35 −32.4%
Battlefield 5	75−80 +8.6%	70−75 −8.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	30 +30.4%	21−24 −30.4%
Far Cry 5	89 +56.1%	55−60 −56.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	88 +44.3%	60−65 −44.3%
Forza Horizon 4	109 +62.7%	65−70 −62.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +14%	40−45 −14%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21 −28.6%	27−30 +28.6%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30 +11.1%	27−30 −11.1%
Hitman 3	45 +45.2%	30−35 −45.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14 −64.3%	21−24 +64.3%
Metro Exodus	30 +42.9%	21−24 −42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	23 +35.3%	16−18 −35.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	33 +37.5%	24−27 −37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	46 +27.8%	36 −27.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +14.3%	21−24 −14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21 +10.5%	18−20 −10.5%
Battlefield 5	40−45 +10.3%	35−40 −10.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	12 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Far Cry 5	45 +55.2%	27−30 −55.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	46 +43.8%	30−35 −43.8%
Forza Horizon 4	70 +55.6%	45−50 −55.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	11 −45.5%	16−18 +45.5%

This is how RX 5600 XT and Quadro P5000 compete in popular games:

RX 5600 XT is 14% faster in 1080p
RX 5600 XT is 13% faster in 1440p
Quadro P5000 is 11% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 5600 XT is 81% faster than the Quadro P5000.
in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P5000 is 74% faster than the RX 5600 XT.

All in all, in popular games:

RX 5600 XT is ahead in 63 tests (93%)
Quadro P5000 is ahead in 5 tests (7%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	35.33	32.14
Recency	21 January 2020	1 October 2016
Cost	$279	$2499
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	100 Watt