GeForce GT 330M vs Radeon RX 5600 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon RX 5600 XT with GeForce GT 330M, including specs and performance data.

RX 5600 XT
2020
6 GB GDDR6, 150 Watt
34.39
+6153%

RX 5600 XT outperforms GT 330M by a whopping 6153% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1471224
Place by popularity79not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation52.99no data
Power efficiency16.101.68
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameNavi 10GT216
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date21 January 2020 (5 years ago)10 January 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230448
Core clock speed1130 MHz625 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,300 million486 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate224.610.00
Floating-point processing power7.188 TFLOPS0.06528 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data182
ROPs648
TMUs14416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB1 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHzUp to 1066 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s25.28 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGADisplayPort
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.54.1
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RX 5600 XT 34.39
+6153%
GT 330M 0.55

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RX 5600 XT 13534
+6166%
GT 330M 216

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RX 5600 XT 86004
+3136%
GT 330M 2658

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p600−650
+5900%
10
−5900%
Full HD110
+511%
18
−511%
1440p64
+6300%
1−2
−6300%
4K380−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.54no data
1440p4.36no data
4K7.34no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 147
+7250%
2−3
−7250%
Counter-Strike 2 77
+1000%
7−8
−1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 83
+4050%
2−3
−4050%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 115
+5650%
2−3
−5650%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+11800%
1−2
−11800%
Counter-Strike 2 63
+800%
7−8
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 74
+3600%
2−3
−3600%
Far Cry 5 148
+7300%
2−3
−7300%
Fortnite 140−150
+7250%
2−3
−7250%
Forza Horizon 4 185
+4525%
4−5
−4525%
Forza Horizon 5 121
+12000%
1−2
−12000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+1771%
7−8
−1771%
Valorant 275
+882%
27−30
−882%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 66
+3200%
2−3
−3200%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+11800%
1−2
−11800%
Counter-Strike 2 53
+657%
7−8
−657%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+1529%
16−18
−1529%
Cyberpunk 2077 63
+3050%
2−3
−3050%
Dota 2 185
+1582%
10−12
−1582%
Far Cry 5 135
+6650%
2−3
−6650%
Fortnite 140−150
+7250%
2−3
−7250%
Forza Horizon 4 173
+4225%
4−5
−4225%
Forza Horizon 5 91
+9000%
1−2
−9000%
Grand Theft Auto V 126
+6200%
2−3
−6200%
Metro Exodus 81 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+1771%
7−8
−1771%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140
+3400%
4−5
−3400%
Valorant 272
+871%
27−30
−871%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+11800%
1−2
−11800%
Counter-Strike 2 47
+571%
7−8
−571%
Cyberpunk 2077 54
+2600%
2−3
−2600%
Dota 2 168
+1427%
10−12
−1427%
Far Cry 5 126
+6200%
2−3
−6200%
Forza Horizon 4 138
+3350%
4−5
−3350%
Forza Horizon 5 85
+8400%
1−2
−8400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+1771%
7−8
−1771%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
+2000%
4−5
−2000%
Valorant 148
+429%
27−30
−429%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 140−150
+7250%
2−3
−7250%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+22400%
1−2
−22400%
Grand Theft Auto V 61 0−1
Metro Exodus 49 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+5733%
3−4
−5733%
Valorant 252
+6200%
4−5
−6200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+8600%
1−2
−8600%
Cyberpunk 2077 30 0−1
Far Cry 5 89
+8800%
1−2
−8800%
Forza Horizon 4 109
+10800%
1−2
−10800%
Forza Horizon 5 59 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+5800%
1−2
−5800%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85
+8200%
1−2
−8200%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 16−18 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 63
+320%
14−16
−320%
Metro Exodus 30 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46 0−1
Valorant 214
+7033%
3−4
−7033%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 6 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 12 0−1
Dota 2 99
+9800%
1−2
−9800%
Far Cry 5 45
+4400%
1−2
−4400%
Forza Horizon 4 70
+6900%
1−2
−6900%
Forza Horizon 5 30 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+1900%
2−3
−1900%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+1900%
2−3
−1900%

This is how RX 5600 XT and GT 330M compete in popular games:

  • RX 5600 XT is 5900% faster in 900p
  • RX 5600 XT is 511% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5600 XT is 6300% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 5600 XT is 22400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 5600 XT surpassed GT 330M in all 35 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.39 0.55
Recency 21 January 2020 10 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 23 Watt

RX 5600 XT has a 6152.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

GT 330M, on the other hand, has 552.2% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 5600 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 330M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5600 XT is a desktop card while GeForce GT 330M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
Radeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M
GeForce GT 330M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 2975 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5600 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 126 votes

Rate GeForce GT 330M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon RX 5600 XT or GeForce GT 330M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.