Radeon R9 M295X: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregated performance score

It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 13.30% of a leader's which is GeForce RTX 4090.

RTX 4090GeForce RTX4090
Compare

Summary

AMD started Radeon R9 M295X sales 16 October 2014. This is a laptop graphics card based on a GCN 3 architecture and made with 28 nm manufacturing process. It is primarily aimed at gamers. 0 MB of Not Listed memory clocked at are supplied, and together with Not Listed memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 160.0 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is card attached via MXM-B (3.0) interface. Power consumption is at 250 Watt.

General info

Some basic facts about Radeon R9 M295X: architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in performance ranking356
Place by popularitynot in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 3 (2014−2016)
GPU code nameTonga
Market segmentLaptop
Release date16 October 2014 (9 years ago)

Technical specs

Radeon R9 M295X's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon R9 M295X's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048of 20480 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT)
Core clock speed723 MHzof 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT)
Number of transistors5,000 millionof 14400 (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile)
Manufacturing process technology28 nmof 4 (Radeon 780M)
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattof 2400 (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem)
Texture fill rate92.54of 969.9 (H100 SXM5 96 GB)
Floating-point performance2,961 gflopsof 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo)

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 M295X's compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNone

Memory

Parameters of memory installed on Radeon R9 M295X: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Memory typeNot Listed
Maximum RAM amount0 MBof 192 (Radeon Instinct MI300X)
Memory bus widthNot Listedof 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/sof 3276 (Aldebaran)
Shared memory-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon R9 M295X. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs

Technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by Radeon R9 M295X. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-
Enduro-
FreeSync1
HD3D+
PowerTune+
DualGraphics1
TrueAudio-
ZeroCore+
Switchable graphics1

API support

APIs supported by Radeon R9 M295X, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectXNot Listed
Shader Model6.3
OpenGL4.4of 4.6 (GeForce RTX 4090)
OpenCLNot Listed
Mantle+

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of Radeon R9 M295X. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M295X 13.30

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 M295X 5150

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R9 M295X 29972

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R9 M295X 8851

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 M295X 6591

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 M295X 38132

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Radeon R9 M295X is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

Full HD48
4K31

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
Battlefield 5 45−50
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
Far Cry 5 30−35
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
Hitman 3 35−40
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
Battlefield 5 45−50
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
Far Cry 5 30−35
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
Hitman 3 35−40
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
Metro Exodus 20−22
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
Battlefield 5 45−50
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
Far Cry 5 30−35
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
Hitman 3 21−24
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
Metro Exodus 12−14
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
Battlefield 5 27−30
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
Far Cry 5 21−24
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
Hitman 3 12−14
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
Metro Exodus 6−7
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
Battlefield 5 12−14
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
Far Cry 5 10−11
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6

Relative performance

Overall Radeon R9 M295X performance compared to nearest competitors among notebook video cards.


NVIDIA equivalent

According to our data, the closest NVIDIA alternative to Radeon R9 M295X is GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile, which is slower by 4% and lower by 6 positions in our ranking.

Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB MobileGeForce GTX1050 3GB Mobile
Compare

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon R9 M295X:

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

R9 M395XRadeon R9M395X
Compare
R9 M395Radeon R9M395
Compare
GTX 860M SLIGeForce GTX860M SLI
Compare
GTX 770M SLIGeForce GTX770M SLI
Compare
GTX 970MGeForce GTX970M
Compare
GTX 1050 MobileGeForce GTX1050 Mobile
Compare

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with Radeon R9 M295X according to our statistics.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.


4.6 17 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M295X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Radeon R9 M295X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.