Arc A580 vs Radeon R9 M295X

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon R9 M295X with Arc A580, including specs and performance data.

R9 M295X
2014
0 MB Not Listed, 250 Watt
13.33

Arc A580 outperforms R9 M295X by a whopping 211% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking35985
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data39.34
ArchitectureGCN 3 (2014−2016)no data
GPU code nameTongaDG2-512
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date16 October 2014 (9 years ago)10 October 2023 (less than a year ago)
Current priceno data$337

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20483072
Core clock speed723 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2000 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt175 Watt
Texture fill rate92.54384.0
Floating-point performance2,961 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon R9 M295X and Arc A580 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeNot ListedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount0 MB8 GB
Memory bus widthNot Listed256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMIno data+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration-no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
PowerTune+no data
DualGraphics1no data
TrueAudio-no data
ZeroCore+no data
Switchable graphics1no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXNot Listed12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.6
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed3.0
Vulkanno data1.3
Mantle+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 M295X 13.33
Arc A580 41.43
+211%

Arc A580 outperforms Radeon R9 M295X by 211% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 M295X 5150
Arc A580 11584
+125%

Arc A580 outperforms Radeon R9 M295X by 125% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R9 M295X 8851
Arc A580 35210
+298%

Arc A580 outperforms Radeon R9 M295X by 298% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

R9 M295X 29972
Arc A580 95677
+219%

Arc A580 outperforms Radeon R9 M295X by 219% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 M295X 6591
Arc A580 27574
+318%

Arc A580 outperforms Radeon R9 M295X by 318% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

R9 M295X 38132
Arc A580 113974
+199%

Arc A580 outperforms Radeon R9 M295X by 199% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD48
−106%
99
+106%
1440p18−20
−211%
56
+211%
4K27
−33.3%
36
+33.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−33
−243%
103
+243%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−215%
85
+215%
Battlefield 5 40−45
−233%
130−140
+233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−211%
80−85
+211%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−230%
85−90
+230%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
−240%
100−110
+240%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
−257%
107
+257%
Hitman 3 27−30
−215%
85−90
+215%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−215%
189
+215%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−231%
110−120
+231%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
−227%
95−100
+227%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
−223%
258
+223%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−244%
93
+244%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−219%
86
+219%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−248%
73
+248%
Battlefield 5 40−45
−233%
130−140
+233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−211%
80−85
+211%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−230%
85−90
+230%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
−240%
100−110
+240%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−242%
150−160
+242%
Hitman 3 27−30
−215%
85−90
+215%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−238%
160−170
+238%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−244%
62
+244%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
−227%
95−100
+227%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65−70
−229%
214
+229%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−216%
174
+216%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−233%
100−105
+233%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−256%
64
+256%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−256%
64
+256%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−211%
80−85
+211%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−250%
21−24
+250%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−230%
85−90
+230%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−222%
87
+222%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−211%
109
+211%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
−222%
177
+222%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−224%
68
+224%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−233%
60
+233%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
−227%
95−100
+227%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−233%
80−85
+233%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
−223%
95−100
+223%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−238%
54
+238%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−219%
51
+219%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−256%
60−65
+256%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−222%
87
+222%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−213%
75
+213%
Hitman 3 16−18
−238%
50−55
+238%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
−222%
87
+222%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−237%
91
+237%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−225%
130
+225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−244%
55
+244%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−236%
47
+236%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−238%
70−75
+238%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−250%
40−45
+250%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Hitman 3 10−11
−240%
30−35
+240%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−231%
50−55
+231%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−225%
39
+225%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−239%
61
+239%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−250%
35
+250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−233%
30
+233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 2−3
Far Cry 5 8−9
−213%
24−27
+213%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−211%
56
+211%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−219%
51
+219%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−225%
52
+225%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−238%
27
+238%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
−270%
35−40
+270%

This is how R9 M295X and Arc A580 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A580 is 106% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A580 is 211% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A580 is 33% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.33 41.43
Recency 16 October 2014 10 October 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 175 Watt

The Arc A580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon R9 M295X in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M295X is a notebook card while Arc A580 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 M295X
Radeon R9 M295X
Intel Arc A580
Arc A580

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 17 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M295X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 176 votes

Rate Arc A580 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.