FirePro S9150 vs Radeon R9 M295X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking442not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.79no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameAmethystHawaii
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date23 November 2014 (11 years ago)7 August 2014 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20482816
Core clock speed723 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million6,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt235 Watt
Texture fill rate92.54158.4
Floating-point processing power2.961 TFLOPS5.069 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs128176
L1 Cache512 KB704 KB
L2 Cache512 KB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0PCIe 3.0
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeNot ListedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount0 MB16 GB
Memory bus widthNot Listed512 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s320 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXNot Listed12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.36.3
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131
Mantle+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 November 2014 7 August 2014
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 235 Watt

R9 M295X has an age advantage of 3 months.

FirePro S9150, on the other hand, has 6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M295X and FirePro S9150. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M295X is a notebook graphics card while FirePro S9150 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 18 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M295X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 13 votes

Rate FirePro S9150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M295X or FirePro S9150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.