AMD Radeon R9 M295X vs R9 M395
Comparison of Radeon R9 M295X and Radeon R9 M395 architecture, market type and release date.
Radeon R9 M295X and Radeon R9 M395's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Radeon R9 M295X and Radeon R9 M395's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
92.54 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Radeon R9 M295X and Radeon R9 M395 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Supplementary power connectors
Parameters of memory installed on Radeon R9 M295X and Radeon R9 M395: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
160.0 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Radeon R9 M295X and Radeon R9 M395.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by Radeon R9 M295X and Radeon R9 M395. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
APIs supported by Radeon R9 M295X and Radeon R9 M395, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Radeon R9 M295X and Radeon R9 M395. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
R9 M295X 19.30 +2.6%
R9 M395 18.82
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
R9 M295X 38132
R9 M395 38490 +0.9%
3DMark Fire Strike Score
R9 M295X 5941 +0.4%
R9 M395 5920
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
R9 M295X 6591
R9 M395 6819 +3.5%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
R9 M295X 8851 +2.3%
R9 M395 8656
R9 M295X 5150 +2.5%
R9 M395 5022
Rendering quality tests
GFXBench render quality
GFXBench high precision render quality
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Radeon R9 M295X and Radeon R9 M395. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
392 Mh/s +16.7%
336 Mh/s −16.7%
Let's see how good Radeon R9 M295X and Radeon R9 M395 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 M295X
2.6% faster in synthetic tests
More pipelines (2048 vs 1792)
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 M395
Somewhat newer (9 June 2015 vs 16 October 2014)
OpenCL 1.2 (Open Computing Language - an API for GPU usage in arbitrary calculations, e.g. for physics simulation)
OpenGL 4.3 (Open Graphics Library - an API for 3D graphics and GPUs usage)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
Mantle (an API developed by AMD for 3D graphics acceleration. Discontinued and later superceded by Vulkan)
So, R9 M295X or R9 M395?
Technical City couldn't decide between AMD Radeon R9 M295X and AMD Radeon R9 M395. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Radeon R9 M295X and Radeon R9 M395, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.