RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded vs Radeon R9 M295X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking442not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.79no data
ArchitectureGCN 3.0 (2014−2019)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameAmethystGB203
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date23 November 2014 (11 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20487680
Core clock speed723 MHz975 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1702 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate92.54408.5
Floating-point processing power2.961 TFLOPS26.14 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs128240
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60
L1 Cache512 KB7.5 MB
L2 Cache512 KB64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 5.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeNot ListedGDDR7
Maximum RAM amount0 MB16 GB
Memory bus widthNot Listed256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s896.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync+-
HD3D+-
PowerTune+-
DualGraphics+-
ZeroCore+-
Switchable graphics+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXNot Listed12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.36.8
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCLNot Listed3.0
Vulkan-1.4
Mantle+-
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 80 Watt

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded has a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 213% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon R9 M295X and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Radeon R9 M295X is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 18 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M295X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon R9 M295X or RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.