Quadro T1000 vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

Place in the ranking	403	327
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	13.16	23.20
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Polaris 22	TU117
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	24 April 2018 (6 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	no data
Core clock speed	931 MHz	1395 MHz
Boost clock speed	1011 MHz	1455 MHz
Number of transistors	5,000 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	80.88	no data
Floating-point processing power	2.588 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	32	no data
TMUs	80	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	IGP	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	no data
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	no data
Memory bus width	1024 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	700 MHz	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	179.2 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX Vega M GL 12.40

Quadro T1000 16.81
+35.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX Vega M GL 4768

Quadro T1000 6462
+35.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	55 −27.3%	70−75 +27.3%
1440p	8 −25%	10−12 +25%
4K	18 −33.3%	24−27 +33.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −22.7%	27−30 +22.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −25%	30−33 +25%
Elden Ring	35−40 −35.1%	50−55 +35.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −25%	50−55 +25%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −22.7%	27−30 +22.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −25%	30−33 +25%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −30%	65−70 +30%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −32.4%	45−50 +32.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −29%	40−45 +29%
Valorant	45−50 −35.4%	65−70 +35.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −25%	50−55 +25%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −22.7%	27−30 +22.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −25%	30−33 +25%
Dota 2	45−50 −33.3%	60−65 +33.3%
Elden Ring	35−40 −35.1%	50−55 +35.1%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −35.4%	65−70 +35.4%
Fortnite	70−75 −33.8%	95−100 +33.8%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −30%	65−70 +30%
Grand Theft Auto V	40−45 −25%	55−60 +25%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −32.4%	45−50 +32.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	123 −30.1%	160−170 +30.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 −29%	40−45 +29%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −31.6%	50−55 +31.6%
Valorant	45−50 −35.4%	65−70 +35.4%
World of Tanks	170−180 −35.3%	230−240 +35.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −25%	50−55 +25%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 −22.7%	27−30 +22.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −25%	30−33 +25%
Dota 2	45−50 −33.3%	60−65 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −35.4%	65−70 +35.4%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −30%	65−70 +30%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	31 −29%	40−45 +29%
Valorant	45−50 −35.4%	65−70 +35.4%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −23.5%	21−24 +23.5%
Elden Ring	18−20 −33.3%	24−27 +33.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −23.5%	21−24 +23.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	75−80 −28.2%	100−105 +28.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −27.3%	14−16 +27.3%
World of Tanks	85−90 −25%	110−120 +25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −20%	30−33 +20%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −25%	35−40 +25%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −20.7%	35−40 +20.7%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −34.6%	35−40 +34.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −20%	18−20 +20%
Valorant	30−35 −29%	40−45 +29%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Dota 2	21−24 −30.4%	30−33 +30.4%
Elden Ring	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 −30.4%	30−33 +30.4%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	34 −32.4%	45−50 +32.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −30.4%	30−33 +30.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−12 −27.3%	14−16 +27.3%
Counter-Strike 2	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Dota 2	21−24 −30.4%	30−33 +30.4%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −20%	18−20 +20%
Fortnite	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −23.5%	21−24 +23.5%
Valorant	12−14 −23.1%	16−18 +23.1%

This is how Pro WX Vega M GL and Quadro T1000 compete in popular games:

Quadro T1000 is 27% faster in 1080p
Quadro T1000 is 25% faster in 1440p
Quadro T1000 is 33% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	12.40	16.81
Recency	24 April 2018	27 May 2019
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	50 Watt

Quadro T1000 has a 35.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 30% lower power consumption.

The Quadro T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is a mobile workstation card while Quadro T1000 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.