NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

Pro WX Vega M GL
11.98

Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL by 307% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking37056
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money2.519.94
ArchitectureVega (2017−2021)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameVega Kaby Lake-GTU102
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date7 January 2018 (6 years old)13 August 2018 (5 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,299
Current price$1359 $3083 (0.5x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 6000 has 296% better value for money than Pro WX Vega M GL.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12804608
Core clock speed931 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speed1011 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate80.88509.8

Size and compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL and Quadro RTX 6000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceIGPPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width1024 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDAno data7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX Vega M GL 11.98
RTX 6000 48.73
+307%

Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL by 307% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro WX Vega M GL 4643
RTX 6000 18884
+307%

Quadro RTX 6000 outperforms Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL by 307% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD52
−304%
210−220
+304%
4K18
−289%
70−75
+289%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−295%
75−80
+295%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 33
−294%
130−140
+294%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−295%
75−80
+295%
Battlefield 5 40−45
−290%
160−170
+290%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−287%
120−130
+287%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−295%
75−80
+295%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−287%
120−130
+287%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−306%
130−140
+306%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−305%
170−180
+305%
Hitman 3 30−35
−306%
130−140
+306%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−300%
100−105
+300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−300%
80−85
+300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 37
−305%
150−160
+305%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−286%
85−90
+286%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27
−270%
100−105
+270%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−295%
75−80
+295%
Battlefield 5 40−45
−290%
160−170
+290%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
−287%
120−130
+287%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−295%
75−80
+295%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−287%
120−130
+287%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−306%
130−140
+306%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−305%
170−180
+305%
Hitman 3 30−35
−306%
130−140
+306%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−300%
100−105
+300%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−289%
70−75
+289%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−300%
80−85
+300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 31
−287%
120−130
+287%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
−286%
170−180
+286%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−286%
85−90
+286%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 17
−282%
65−70
+282%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−295%
75−80
+295%
Battlefield 5 40−45
−290%
160−170
+290%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−295%
75−80
+295%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−287%
120−130
+287%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−306%
130−140
+306%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−305%
170−180
+305%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
−296%
95−100
+296%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−286%
85−90
+286%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−282%
65−70
+282%
Hitman 3 18−20
−295%
75−80
+295%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
−289%
70−75
+289%
Metro Exodus 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−300%
60−65
+300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−291%
90−95
+291%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−295%
75−80
+295%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−305%
85−90
+305%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−291%
90−95
+291%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−275%
30−33
+275%
Hitman 3 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8
−275%
30−33
+275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
−300%
60−65
+300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10
−300%
40−45
+300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Battlefield 5 10−12
−264%
40−45
+264%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−300%
8−9
+300%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−300%
40−45
+300%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−275%
45−50
+275%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−306%
65−70
+306%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%

This is how Pro WX Vega M GL and RTX 6000 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • RTX 6000 is 304% faster than Pro WX Vega M GL

4K resolution:

  • RTX 6000 is 289% faster than Pro WX Vega M GL

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 11.98 48.73
Recency 7 January 2018 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 260 Watt

The Quadro RTX 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL is a mobile workstation card while Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Quadro RTX 6000

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


This video card has no user ratings yet.

Rate AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 121 vote

Rate NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.