Quadro T1000 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad
Buy on Amazon

Aggregated performance score

Pro WX 3200
2019
4 GB GDDR5
6.27

Quadro T1000 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 by 172% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking542295
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation3.158.60
ArchitecturePolaris (2016−2019)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code namePolaris 12TU117
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date26 September 2019 (4 years ago)27 May 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data
Current price$740 (3.7x MSRP)$920

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro T1000 has 173% better value for money than Pro WX 3200.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed1082 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1455 MHz
Number of transistors2,200 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate41.44no data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
WidthMXM Moduleno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed6000 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x mini-DisplayPortNo outputs

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_0)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 3200 6.27
Quadro T1000 17.05
+172%

Quadro T1000 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 by 172% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro WX 3200 2427
Quadro T1000 6599
+172%

Quadro T1000 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 by 172% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD19
−163%
50−55
+163%
4K8
−163%
21−24
+163%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Battlefield 5 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Far Cry 5 20
−150%
50−55
+150%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−162%
55−60
+162%
Hitman 3 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Battlefield 5 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Far Cry 5 18
−150%
45−50
+150%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−162%
55−60
+162%
Hitman 3 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Metro Exodus 10
−170%
27−30
+170%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−145%
27−30
+145%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
−167%
40−45
+167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Battlefield 5 20−22
−150%
50−55
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Far Cry 5 17
−165%
45−50
+165%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−167%
40−45
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
−162%
55−60
+162%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−170%
27−30
+170%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Hitman 3 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%
Hitman 3 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5
−140%
12−14
+140%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Battlefield 5 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

This is how Pro WX 3200 and Quadro T1000 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro T1000 is 163% faster than Pro WX 3200 in 1080p
  • Quadro T1000 is 163% faster than Pro WX 3200 in 4K

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 6.27 17.05
Recency 26 September 2019 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 50 Watt

The Quadro T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 3200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Radeon Pro WX 3200
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 73 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 295 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.