Radeon 880M vs Pro WX 4150

Place in the ranking	560	275
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	9.41	91.63
Architecture	GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)	RDNA 3.5 (2024)
GPU code name	Baffin	Strix Point
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	1 March 2017 (7 years ago)	15 July 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	896	512
Core clock speed	1002 MHz	400 MHz
Boost clock speed	1053 MHz	2900 MHz
Number of transistors	3,000 million	34,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	58.97	92.80
Floating-point processing power	1.887 TFLOPS	2.97 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	56	32
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.8
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 4150 6.86

Radeon 880M 20.03
+192%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro WX 4150 2641

Radeon 880M 7717
+192%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	10−12 −250%	35 +250%
1440p	7−8 −214%	22 +214%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

10−12

−173%

30−33
+173%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −165%	45−50 +165%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −167%	24−27 +167%
Battlefield 5	18−20 −189%	55−60 +189%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +600%	2−3 −600%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −167%	40−45 +167%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −189%	55−60 +189%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −189%	130−140 +189%
Hitman 3	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +400%	8−9 −400%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −189%	55−60 +189%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −189%	55−60 +189%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +475%	4−5 −475%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +89.3%	27−30 −89.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +467%	3−4 −467%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −167%	24−27 +167%
Battlefield 5	18−20 −189%	55−60 +189%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +600%	2−3 −600%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −167%	40−45 +167%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −189%	55−60 +189%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −189%	130−140 +189%
Hitman 3	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +400%	8−9 −400%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −189%	55−60 +189%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −189%	55−60 +189%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +475%	4−5 −475%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +133%	9−10 −133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +89.3%	27−30 −89.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +467%	3−4 −467%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −167%	24−27 +167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +600%	2−3 −600%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −173%	30−33 +173%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −167%	40−45 +167%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −189%	130−140 +189%
Hitman 3	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +400%	8−9 −400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +475%	4−5 −475%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +133%	9−10 −133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −183%	150−160 +183%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

−189%

55−60
+189%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −169%	35−40 +169%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 −170%	27−30 +170%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −183%	65−70 +183%
Hitman 3	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%
Metro Exodus	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −179%	120−130 +179%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

12−14
+500%

2−3

−500%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −167%	16−18 +167%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Hitman 3	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 −175%	55−60 +175%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −150%	5−6 +150%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8
+250%

2−3

−250%

This is how Pro WX 4150 and Radeon 880M compete in popular games:

Radeon 880M is 250% faster in 1080p
Radeon 880M is 214% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro WX 4150 is 650% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, Pro WX 4150 surpassed Radeon 880M in all 23 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	6.86	20.03
Recency	1 March 2017	15 July 2024
Chip lithography	14 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	15 Watt

Radeon 880M has a 192% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 880M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 4150 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon 880M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.