Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Quadro RTX 8000

Place in performance ranking	52	546
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	10.46	3.23
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Polaris (2016−2019)
GPU code name	TU102	Polaris 12
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	13 August 2018 (5 years ago)	26 September 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$9,999	$199
Current price	$3230 (0.3x MSRP)	$740 (3.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 8000 has 224% better value for money than Pro WX 3200.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	4608	640
Core clock speed	1395 MHz	1082 MHz
Boost clock speed	1770 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	18,600 million	2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	260 Watt	65 Watt
Texture fill rate	509.8	41.44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	MXM Module
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	48 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	672.0 GB/s	64 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.5	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	7.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 8000 50.44
+701%

Pro WX 3200 6.30

Quadro RTX 8000 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 by 701% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 8000 19480
+701%

Pro WX 3200 2433

Quadro RTX 8000 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 by 701% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	150−160 +689%	19 −689%
4K	60−65 +650%	8 −650%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

10−11
+900%

1−2

−900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +1200%	1−2 −1200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8	0−1
Battlefield 5	18−20 +800%	2−3 −800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +1200%	1−2 −1200%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +1300%	1−2 −1300%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +800%	2−3 −800%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 +900%	3−4 −900%
Hitman 3	12−14 +1100%	1−2 −1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +900%	3−4 −900%
Metro Exodus	24 +1100%	2−3 −1100%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +750%	2−3 −750%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +950%	2−3 −950%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +767%	3−4 −767%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +1200%	1−2 −1200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8	0−1
Battlefield 5	18−20 +800%	2−3 −800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +1200%	1−2 −1200%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +1300%	1−2 −1300%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 +800%	2−3 −800%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 +900%	3−4 −900%
Hitman 3	12−14 +1100%	1−2 −1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +900%	3−4 −900%
Metro Exodus	7	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +750%	2−3 −750%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +950%	2−3 −950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	15 +1400%	1−2 −1400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +767%	3−4 −767%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +1200%	1−2 −1200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +1200%	1−2 −1200%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +1300%	1−2 −1300%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 +900%	3−4 −900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +900%	3−4 −900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +950%	2−3 −950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10 +900%	1−2 −900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +767%	3−4 −767%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

+750%

2−3
−750%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +1100%	1−2 −1100%
Far Cry New Dawn	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4	0−1
Far Cry 5	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 +1000%	1−2 −1000%
Hitman 3	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +1300%	1−2 −1300%
Metro Exodus	6−7	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3−4	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4	0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−12
+1000%

1−2

−1000%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5	0−1
Hitman 3	2−3	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5	0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	3−4	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	6−7	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7	0−1
Metro Exodus	7−8	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8

0−1

This is how RTX 8000 and Pro WX 3200 compete in popular games:

RTX 8000 is 689% faster in 1080p
RTX 8000 is 650% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	50.44	6.30
Recency	13 August 2018	26 September 2019
Cost	$9999	$199
Maximum RAM amount	48 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	260 Watt	65 Watt