Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs Tesla T4

Place in performance ranking	183	546
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	19.50	3.23
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Polaris (2016−2019)
GPU code name	TU104	Polaris 12
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	13 September 2018 (5 years ago)	26 September 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$199
Current price	$782	$740 (3.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Tesla T4 has 504% better value for money than Pro WX 3200.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	640
Core clock speed	585 MHz	1082 MHz
Boost clock speed	1590 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	13,600 million	2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	70 Watt	65 Watt
Texture fill rate	254.4	41.44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Length	168 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	MXM Module
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	10000 MHz	6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	320.0 GB/s	64 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.5	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	7.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tesla T4 28.05
+345%

Pro WX 3200 6.30

Tesla T4 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 by 345% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Tesla T4 10832
+345%

Pro WX 3200 2433

Tesla T4 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 by 345% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	80−85 +321%	19 −321%
4K	35−40 +338%	8 −338%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

40−45
+300%

10−11

−300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +323%	12−14 −323%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +329%	7−8 −329%
Battlefield 5	80−85 +344%	18−20 −344%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 +323%	12−14 −323%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +300%	10−11 −300%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +329%	14−16 −329%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 +344%	18−20 −344%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +333%	30−33 −333%
Hitman 3	50−55 +317%	12−14 −317%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 +333%	30−33 −333%
Metro Exodus	100−105 +317%	24 −317%
Red Dead Redemption 2	75−80 +341%	16−18 −341%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	90−95 +329%	21−24 −329%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 +323%	24−27 −323%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +323%	12−14 −323%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +329%	7−8 −329%
Battlefield 5	80−85 +344%	18−20 −344%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 +323%	12−14 −323%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +300%	10−11 −300%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +329%	14−16 −329%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 +344%	18−20 −344%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +333%	30−33 −333%
Hitman 3	50−55 +317%	12−14 −317%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 +333%	30−33 −333%
Metro Exodus	30−33 +329%	7 −329%
Red Dead Redemption 2	75−80 +341%	16−18 −341%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	90−95 +329%	21−24 −329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 +333%	15 −333%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 +323%	24−27 −323%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +323%	12−14 −323%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +329%	7−8 −329%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	55−60 +323%	12−14 −323%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +300%	10−11 −300%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +329%	14−16 −329%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +333%	30−33 −333%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 +333%	30−33 −333%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	90−95 +329%	21−24 −329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +300%	10 −300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	110−120 +323%	24−27 −323%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

75−80
+341%

16−18

−341%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 +317%	12−14 −317%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +344%	9−10 −344%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +300%	6−7 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 +338%	8−9 −338%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +300%	10−11 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +309%	10−12 −309%
Hitman 3	40−45 +300%	10−11 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	60−65 +329%	14−16 −329%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +300%	6−7 −300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +320%	5−6 −320%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50
+309%

10−12

−309%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +320%	5−6 −320%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Hitman 3	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +300%	6−7 −300%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +320%	5 −320%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	12−14 +300%	3−4 −300%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 +300%	6−7 −300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 +300%	6−7 −300%
Metro Exodus	30−33 +329%	7−8 −329%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−33

+329%

7−8
−329%

This is how Tesla T4 and Pro WX 3200 compete in popular games:

Tesla T4 is 321% faster in 1080p
Tesla T4 is 338% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	28.05	6.30
Recency	13 September 2018	26 September 2019
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	70 Watt	65 Watt