AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

RTX 4000
39.78
+535%

Quadro RTX 4000 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 by 535% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking99542
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money27.393.15
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Polaris (2016−2019)
GPU code nameTU104Polaris 12
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 November 2018 (5 years old)26 September 2019 (4 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$899 $199
Current price$974 (1.1x MSRP)$740 (3.7x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 4000 has 770% better value for money than Pro WX 3200.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2304640
Core clock speed1005 MHz1082 MHz
Boost clock speed1545 MHzno data
Number of transistors13,600 million2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate222.541.44

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotMXM Module
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed13000 MHz6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth416.0 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C4x mini-DisplayPort

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 4000 39.78
+535%
Pro WX 3200 6.26

Quadro RTX 4000 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 by 535% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 4000 15415
+535%
Pro WX 3200 2427

Quadro RTX 4000 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 by 535% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD120−130
+532%
19
−532%
4K50−55
+525%
8
−525%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 39.78 6.26
Recency 13 November 2018 26 September 2019
Cost $899 $199
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 65 Watt

The Quadro RTX 4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro WX 3200 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
Quadro RTX 4000
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
Radeon Pro WX 3200

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 424 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 72 votes

Rate AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.