Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Pro WX 3200

Place in performance ranking	542	76
Place by popularity	not in top-100	38
Value for money	3.15	100.00
Architecture	Polaris (2016−2019)	Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code name	Polaris 12	Navi 10
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	26 September 2019 (4 years ago)	7 July 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$199	$399
Current price	$740 (3.7x MSRP)	$111 (0.3x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5700 XT has 3075% better value for money than Pro WX 3200.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	2560
Core clock speed	1082 MHz	1605 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1905 MHz
Number of transistors	2,200 million	10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	41.44	304.8

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	272 mm
Width	MXM Module	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	64 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x mini-DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	no data	+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready	no data	+
Multi Monitor	no data	+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro WX 3200 6.27

RX 5700 XT 43.04
+586%

RX 5700 XT outperforms Pro WX 3200 by 586% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro WX 3200 2427

RX 5700 XT 16664
+587%

RX 5700 XT outperforms Pro WX 3200 by 587% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Pro WX 3200 12538

RX 5700 XT 83961
+570%

RX 5700 XT outperforms Pro WX 3200 by 570% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Pro WX 3200 4338

RX 5700 XT 35823
+726%

RX 5700 XT outperforms Pro WX 3200 by 726% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Pro WX 3200 3156

RX 5700 XT 26189
+730%

RX 5700 XT outperforms Pro WX 3200 by 730% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Pro WX 3200 18866

RX 5700 XT 146093
+674%

RX 5700 XT outperforms Pro WX 3200 by 674% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 8%

Pro WX 3200 105833

RX 5700 XT 499658
+372%

RX 5700 XT outperforms Pro WX 3200 by 372% in 3DMark Ice Storm GPU.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Pro WX 3200 22

RX 5700 XT 115
+423%

RX 5700 XT outperforms Pro WX 3200 by 423% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Pro WX 3200 40

RX 5700 XT 110
+172%

RX 5700 XT outperforms Pro WX 3200 by 172% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Pro WX 3200 32

RX 5700 XT 43
+36.8%

RX 5700 XT outperforms Pro WX 3200 by 37% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Pro WX 3200 28

RX 5700 XT 174
+530%

RX 5700 XT outperforms Pro WX 3200 by 530% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Pro WX 3200 34

RX 5700 XT 81
+137%

RX 5700 XT outperforms Pro WX 3200 by 137% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Pro WX 3200 8

RX 5700 XT 47
+479%

RX 5700 XT outperforms Pro WX 3200 by 479% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Pro WX 3200 18

RX 5700 XT 141
+697%

RX 5700 XT outperforms Pro WX 3200 by 697% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Pro WX 3200 2

RX 5700 XT 13
+694%

RX 5700 XT outperforms Pro WX 3200 by 694% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Pro WX 3200 18

RX 5700 XT 138
+679%

RX 5700 XT outperforms Pro WX 3200 by 679% in SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase.

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Benchmark coverage: 2%

Pro WX 3200 28

RX 5700 XT 159
+475%

RX 5700 XT outperforms Pro WX 3200 by 475% in SPECviewperf 12 - Catia.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	19 −563%	126 +563%
1440p	10−12 −670%	77 +670%
4K	8 −513%	49 +513%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

10−11

−680%

78
+680%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −533%	76 +533%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −1471%	110 +1471%
Battlefield 5	20−22 −495%	119 +495%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −668%	146 +668%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −680%	78 +680%
Far Cry 5	20 −590%	138 +590%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −940%	156 +940%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −638%	155 +638%
Hitman 3	14−16 −1047%	172 +1047%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −858%	115 +858%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −1000%	121 +1000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −800%	135 +800%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 −1244%	121 +1244%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −483%	70 +483%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −1200%	91 +1200%
Battlefield 5	20−22 −450%	110 +450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −532%	120 +532%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −650%	75 +650%
Far Cry 5	18 −622%	130 +622%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −893%	149 +893%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −633%	154 +633%
Hitman 3	14−16 −880%	147 +880%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −608%	85 +608%
Metro Exodus	10 −870%	97 +870%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −500%	66 +500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −707%	121 +707%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	15 −927%	154 +927%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 −1078%	106 +1078%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −417%	62 +417%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −1014%	78 +1014%
Battlefield 5	20−22 −425%	105 +425%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −570%	67 +570%
Far Cry 5	17 −553%	111 +553%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −547%	97 +547%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −605%	148 +605%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10 −830%	93 +830%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 −644%	67 +644%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 −778%	79 +778%
Hitman 3	10−11 −850%	95 +850%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −367%	56 +367%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −1325%	57 +1325%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −950%	42 +950%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −756%	77 +756%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −960%	53 +960%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −5800%	59 +5800%
Battlefield 5	5−6 −1680%	89 +1680%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1233%	40 +1233%
Far Cry 5	10−11 −870%	97 +870%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −1386%	104 +1386%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −1222%	119 +1222%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −983%	65−70 +983%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −4500%	46 +4500%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −1025%	45 +1025%
Hitman 3	6−7 −783%	53 +783%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −87.5%	15 +87.5%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −3400%	35 +3400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −800%	27 +800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 −1850%	39 +1850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5 −980%	54 +980%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1067%	35 +1067%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −1550%	33 +1550%
Battlefield 5	2−3 −2900%	60 +2900%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	17
Far Cry 5	6−7 −783%	53 +783%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −600%	56 +600%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −1217%	79 +1217%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −1200%	13 +1200%

This is how Pro WX 3200 and RX 5700 XT compete in popular games:

RX 5700 XT is 563% faster than Pro WX 3200 in 1080p
RX 5700 XT is 670% faster than Pro WX 3200 in 1440p
RX 5700 XT is 513% faster than Pro WX 3200 in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 5700 XT is 5800% faster than the Pro WX 3200.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 5700 XT surpassed Pro WX 3200 in all 67 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	6.27	43.04
Recency	26 September 2019	7 July 2019
Cost	$199	$399
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	225 Watt