To calculate the index we compare the characteristics of graphics cards against their prices.
NVIDIA RTX A4500 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6800
- Interface PCIe 4.0 x16
- Core clock speed 2075
- Max video memory 32768
- Memory type GDDR6
- Memory clock speed 16000
- Maximum resolution
- Interface PCIe 4.0 x16
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory 20 GB
- Memory type GDDR6
- Memory clock speed 16 Gbps
- Maximum resolution
General info
Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.
Place in performance rating | 32 | 21 |
Value for money | 14.34 | 3.87 |
Architecture | Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022) | Ampere (2020−2022) |
GPU code name | Navi 21 | GA102 |
Market segment | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 8 June 2021 (1 year old) | 23 November 2021 (1 year old) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,249 | no data |
Current price | $2884 (1.3x MSRP) | $3178 |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3840 | 7168 |
Core clock speed | 2075 MHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2320 MHz | 1650 MHz |
Number of transistors | 26,800 million | 28,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 8 nm |
Thermal design power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 200 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 556.8 | 369.6 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 20 GB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 320 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 16000 MHz | 16 GB/s |
Memory bandwidth | 512.0 GB/s | 640.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | no data |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | 6x mini-DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
API support
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.6 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | 3.0 |
Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3 |
CUDA | no data | 8.6 |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- Passmark
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
RTX A4500 outperforms Radeon Pro W6800 by 9% in Passmark.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 141 | no data |
1440p | 125 | no data |
4K | 83 | no data |
Popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 85−90 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 80−85 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 80−85 | no data |
Battlefield 5 | 130−140 | no data |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 130−140 | no data |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 85−90 | no data |
Far Cry 5 | 70 | no data |
Far Cry New Dawn | 61 | no data |
Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150 | no data |
Hitman 3 | 150−160 | no data |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 100−110 | no data |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75−80 | no data |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 120−130 | no data |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 85−90 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 80−85 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 80−85 | no data |
Battlefield 5 | 130−140 | no data |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 130−140 | no data |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 85−90 | no data |
Far Cry 5 | 65 | no data |
Far Cry New Dawn | 59 | no data |
Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150 | no data |
Hitman 3 | 150−160 | no data |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 100−110 | no data |
Metro Exodus | 160 | no data |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 75−80 | no data |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 120−130 | no data |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 199 | no data |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 85−90 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 80−85 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 80−85 | no data |
Battlefield 5 | 130−140 | no data |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 85−90 | no data |
Far Cry 5 | 62 | no data |
Far Cry New Dawn | 55 | no data |
Forza Horizon 4 | 140−150 | no data |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 157 | no data |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 85−90 | no data |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 80−85 | no data |
Hitman 3 | 95−100 | no data |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 65−70 | no data |
Metro Exodus | 171 | no data |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 40−45 | no data |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 75−80 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 50−55 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 50−55 | no data |
Battlefield 5 | 95−100 | no data |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 40−45 | no data |
Far Cry 5 | 64 | no data |
Far Cry New Dawn | 55 | no data |
Forza Horizon 4 | 100−110 | no data |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 45−50 | no data |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 45−50 | no data |
Hitman 3 | 50−55 | no data |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 35−40 | no data |
Metro Exodus | 55 | no data |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 27−30 | no data |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 40−45 | no data |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 99 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 35−40 | no data |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 30−35 | no data |
Battlefield 5 | 60−65 | no data |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 18−20 | no data |
Far Cry 5 | 60 | no data |
Far Cry New Dawn | 55 | no data |
Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75 | no data |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 24−27 | no data |
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance rating | 48.65 | 52.96 |
Recency | 8 June 2021 | 23 November 2021 |
Memory bus width | 256 | 320 |
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3840 | 7168 |
Memory bandwidth | 512 | 640 |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 8 nm |
Thermal design power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 200 Watt |
Technical City couldn't decide between
and
The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Competitors of Radeon Pro W6800 by NVIDIA
We believe that the nearest equivalent to Radeon Pro W6800 from NVIDIA is Quadro RTX 6000, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 1 position in our rating.
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon Pro W6800:
Competitors of RTX A4500 by AMD
According to our data, the nearest equivalent to RTX A4500 by AMD is Radeon Pro W6800, which is slower by 8% and lower by 11 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to RTX A4500:
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.