RTX A5000-8Q vs Radeon Pro W6800

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking53not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation23.64no data
Power efficiency14.09no data
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 21GA102
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date8 June 2021 (3 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,249 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38408192
Core clock speed2075 MHz1170 MHz
Boost clock speed2320 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors26,800 million28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate556.8433.9
Floating-point processing power17.82 TFLOPS27.77 TFLOPS
ROPs9696
TMUs240256
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Cores6064

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth512.0 GB/s768.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors6x mini-DisplayPort4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 June 2021 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 230 Watt

Pro W6800 has an age advantage of 1 month, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

RTX A5000-8Q, on the other hand, has 8.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Radeon Pro W6800 and RTX A5000-8Q. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6800
Radeon Pro W6800
NVIDIA RTX A5000-8Q
RTX A5000-8Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 82 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX A5000-8Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.