Radeon 780M vs Pro W6600M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro W6600M with Radeon 780M, including specs and performance data.

Pro W6600M
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 90 Watt
27.38
+49.7%

Pro W6600M outperforms 780M by an impressive 50% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking205305
Place by popularitynot in top-10048
Power efficiency20.9884.09
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameNavi 23Hawx Point
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date8 June 2021 (3 years ago)6 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792768
Core clock speed1224 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed2034 MHz2700 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate227.8129.6
Floating-point processing power7.29 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs11248
Ray Tracing Cores2812

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1750 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.12.1
Vulkan1.31.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro W6600M 27.38
+49.7%
Radeon 780M 18.29

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro W6600M 10525
+49.7%
Radeon 780M 7030

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
+38.9%
36
−38.9%
1440p27−30
+42.1%
19
−42.1%
4K18−20
+38.5%
13
−38.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+62.5%
32
−62.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+43.6%
39
−43.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+39%
55−60
−39%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+62.5%
32
−62.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+273%
15
−273%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+87.7%
65
−87.7%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+46.9%
45−50
−46.9%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+61.4%
44
−61.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+37.2%
40−45
−37.2%
Valorant 100−110
+47.3%
70−75
−47.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+39%
55−60
−39%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+108%
25
−108%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+367%
12
−367%
Dota 2 90−95
+221%
29
−221%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+153%
32
−153%
Fortnite 130−140
+36.7%
95−100
−36.7%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+126%
54
−126%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+46.9%
45−50
−46.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 90−95
+104%
45
−104%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+122%
32
−122%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+31.7%
120−130
−31.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+37.2%
40−45
−37.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+57.9%
55−60
−57.9%
Valorant 100−110
+47.3%
70−75
−47.3%
World of Tanks 260−270
+20.9%
220−230
−20.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+39%
55−60
−39%
Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+136%
22
−136%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+367%
12
−367%
Dota 2 90−95
+43.1%
65−70
−43.1%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+28.6%
60−65
−28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+165%
46
−165%
Forza Horizon 5 70−75
+46.9%
45−50
−46.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+31.7%
120−130
−31.7%
Valorant 100−110
+47.3%
70−75
−47.3%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 45−50
+161%
18
−161%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+147%
19
−147%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+5.4%
160−170
−5.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
World of Tanks 170−180
+43.2%
120−130
−43.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+48.6%
35−40
−48.6%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+100%
16
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+71.4%
14−16
−71.4%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+70.8%
45−50
−70.8%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+131%
32
−131%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+51.7%
27−30
−51.7%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+51.2%
40−45
−51.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+110%
20
−110%
Valorant 75−80
+61.7%
45−50
−61.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
Dota 2 45−50
+129%
21
−129%
Grand Theft Auto V 45−50
+129%
21
−129%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+61.5%
12−14
−61.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+52.7%
55−60
−52.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+129%
21
−129%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Dota 2 45−50
+54.8%
30−35
−54.8%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+60.9%
21−24
−60.9%
Fortnite 35−40
+66.7%
21−24
−66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+153%
17
−153%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+60%
14−16
−60%
Valorant 35−40
+76.2%
21−24
−76.2%

This is how Pro W6600M and Radeon 780M compete in popular games:

  • Pro W6600M is 39% faster in 1080p
  • Pro W6600M is 42% faster in 1440p
  • Pro W6600M is 38% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro W6600M is 367% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Pro W6600M surpassed Radeon 780M in all 64 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.38 18.29
Recency 8 June 2021 6 December 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 15 Watt

Pro W6600M has a 49.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Radeon 780M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 500% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro W6600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 780M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro W6600M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon 780M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
Radeon Pro W6600M
AMD Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1644 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.