RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile vs Radeon Pro W6600M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Pro W6300M Pro W6600M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
500 Blackwell Embedded 500 Blackwell Mobile 1000 Blackwell Mobile 2000 Blackwell Embedded 2000 Blackwell Mobile 3000 Blackwell Mobile 4000 Blackwell Embedded 4000 Blackwell Mobile 5000 Blackwell Embedded 5000 Blackwell Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro W6600M and RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro W6600M
2021
8 GB GDDR6, 90 Watt
27.03
+0.9%

Pro W6600M outperforms RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Pro W6600M Pro W6600M
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking240241
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.2759.33
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameNavi 23GB207
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date8 June 2021 (4 years ago)19 March 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17921792
Core clock speed1224 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speed2034 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors11,060 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)90 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate227.8141.1
Floating-point processing power7.29 TFLOPS9.032 TFLOPS
ROPs6424
TMUs11256
Tensor Coresno data56
Ray Tracing Cores2814
L0 Cache448 KBno data
L1 Cache512 KB1.8 MB
L2 Cache2 MB24 MB
L3 Cache32 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.13.0
Vulkan1.31.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD55−60
−7.3%
59
+7.3%
1440p35−40
−8.6%
38
+8.6%
4K27−30
−7.4%
29
+7.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+2.6%
150−160
−2.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+3.4%
55−60
−3.4%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 100−110
+1.9%
100−110
−1.9%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+2.6%
150−160
−2.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+3.4%
55−60
−3.4%
Escape from Tarkov 100−110
+2%
100−110
−2%
Far Cry 5 90−95
−10%
99
+10%
Fortnite 130−140
+2.3%
120−130
−2.3%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+2.8%
100−110
−2.8%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+3.5%
85−90
−3.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+2.8%
100−110
−2.8%
Valorant 180−190
+1.7%
170−180
−1.7%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 100−110
+1.9%
100−110
−1.9%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+2.6%
150−160
−2.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0.7%
260−270
−0.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+3.4%
55−60
−3.4%
Dota 2 130−140
+8.3%
120−130
−8.3%
Escape from Tarkov 100−110
+2%
100−110
−2%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+1.1%
89
−1.1%
Fortnite 130−140
+2.3%
120−130
−2.3%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+2.8%
100−110
−2.8%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
+3.5%
85−90
−3.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 95−100
−14.1%
113
+14.1%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+3.3%
60−65
−3.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+2.8%
100−110
−2.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+3.6%
80−85
−3.6%
Valorant 180−190
+1.7%
170−180
−1.7%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+1.9%
100−110
−1.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+3.4%
55−60
−3.4%
Dota 2 130−140
+8.3%
120−130
−8.3%
Escape from Tarkov 100−110
+2%
100−110
−2%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+5.9%
85
−5.9%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+2.8%
100−110
−2.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+2.8%
100−110
−2.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+3.6%
80−85
−3.6%
Valorant 180−190
+1.1%
180−190
−1.1%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 130−140
+2.3%
120−130
−2.3%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+3.3%
60−65
−3.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
+2.6%
190−200
−2.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
−11.3%
59
+11.3%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+2.7%
35−40
−2.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+2.9%
170−180
−2.9%
Valorant 210−220
+1.4%
210−220
−1.4%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80
+2.7%
70−75
−2.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+3.6%
27−30
−3.6%
Escape from Tarkov 60−65
+3.2%
60−65
−3.2%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+8.5%
59
−8.5%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+2.8%
70−75
−2.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+4.5%
40−45
−4.5%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 65−70
+3%
65−70
−3%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+3.6%
27−30
−3.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+3.8%
50−55
−3.8%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+4.3%
21−24
−4.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+2.4%
40−45
−2.4%
Valorant 160−170
+3.1%
160−170
−3.1%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+2.4%
40−45
−2.4%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Dota 2 85−90
+3.5%
85−90
−3.5%
Escape from Tarkov 30−33
+3.4%
27−30
−3.4%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+13.8%
29
−13.8%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+2.1%
45−50
−2.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 30−35
+3.2%
30−35
−3.2%

This is how Pro W6600M and RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is 7% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is 9% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is 7% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro W6600M is 14% faster.
  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile is 14% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro W6600M performs better in 55 tests (95%)
  • RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile performs better in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 27.03 26.80
Recency 8 June 2021 19 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 90 Watt 35 Watt

Pro W6600M has a 0.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 157.1% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro W6600M and RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro W6600M
Radeon Pro W6600M
NVIDIA RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro W6600M Radeon Pro W6600M
vs
P4200 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Max-Q
RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile
vs
Pro Vega 48 Radeon Pro Vega 48
Pro W6600M Radeon Pro W6600M
vs
Quadro P5200 Quadro P5200
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile 1080 SLI Mobile
vs
GTX 1080 Mobile 1080 Mobile
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile 1080 SLI Mobile
vs
GTX 980 SLI Mobile 980 SLI Mobile
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile 1080 SLI Mobile
vs
GTX 1080 1080
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile 1080 SLI Mobile
vs
GTX 1080 Ti 1080 Ti
GTX 1080 SLI Mobile 1080 SLI Mobile
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB 1060 6 GB
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
vs
Radeon 820M 820M
RX 9060 RX 9060
vs
R9 M390 R9 M390
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) Graphics 4 Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
vs
R9 260 OEM R9 260 OEM
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) Graphics 4 Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
vs
RX 580 XTR RX 580 XTR
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) Graphics 4 Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
vs
RX 580G RX 580G

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W6600M or RTX PRO 500 Blackwell Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.