Radeon RX Vega 7 vs Pro Vega 56

Place in performance ranking	162	501
Place by popularity	not in top-100	10
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.01	10.99
Architecture	Vega (2017−2021)	Vega (2017−2021)
GPU code name	Vega	Vega Raven Ridge
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	14 December 2017 (6 years ago)	7 January 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$399	no data
Current price	$4999 (12.5x MSRP)	$387

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX Vega 7 has 265% better value for money than Pro Vega 56.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	448
Core clock speed	1247 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1250 MHz	1800 MHz
Number of transistors	12,500 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	210 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	280.0	no data
Floating-point performance	9,677 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro Vega 56 and Radeon RX Vega 7 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	IGP	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	no data
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	no data
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	786 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	402.4 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	no data
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12_1
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	2.0	no data
Vulkan	1.1.125	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro Vega 56 31.95
+330%

RX Vega 7 7.43

Pro Vega 56 outperforms RX Vega 7 by 330% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Pro Vega 56 25589
+388%

RX Vega 7 5249

Pro Vega 56 outperforms RX Vega 7 by 388% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Pro Vega 56 17797
+432%

RX Vega 7 3348

Pro Vega 56 outperforms RX Vega 7 by 432% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	98 +326%	23 −326%
1440p	160−170 +310%	39 −310%
4K	60 +253%	17 −253%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

50−55
+200%

−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +181%	21 −181%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +195%	19 −195%
Battlefield 5	100−110 +373%	21−24 −373%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 +318%	17 −318%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +286%	14 −286%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +318%	17 −318%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 +315%	20−22 −315%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +168%	37 −168%
Hitman 3	75−80 +276%	21 −276%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +178%	41 −178%
Metro Exodus	85−90 +226%	27 −226%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 +200%	27 −200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−110 +255%	29 −255%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +247%	17 −247%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +247%	17 −247%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +273%	15 −273%
Battlefield 5	100−110 +373%	21−24 −373%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 +294%	18 −294%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +440%	10 −440%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +154%	28 −154%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 +730%	10 −730%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +183%	35 −183%
Hitman 3	75−80 +1029%	7 −1029%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +268%	31 −268%
Metro Exodus	85−90 +340%	20 −340%
Red Dead Redemption 2	80−85 +305%	20 −305%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	100−110 +442%	19 −442%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	116 +511%	19 −511%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +293%	15 −293%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +293%	14−16 −293%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	55−60 +522%	9−10 −522%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	70−75 +344%	16−18 −344%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +500%	9 −500%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +209%	21−24 −209%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +267%	27 −267%
Horizon Zero Dawn	110−120 +418%	22 −418%
Metro Exodus	85−90 +389%	18 −389%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	64 +392%	13 −392%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +392%	12−14 −392%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

80−85
+350%

−350%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	60−65 +336%	14−16 −336%
Far Cry New Dawn	70−75 +555%	10−12 −555%
Hitman 3	40−45 +389%	9−10 −389%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +400%	5−6 −400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 +483%	6−7 −483%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +1600%	2−3 −1600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +411%	9−10 −411%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +667%	3−4 −667%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +418%	10−12 −418%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 +400%	12−14 −400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +325%	16−18 −325%
Metro Exodus	60−65 +663%	8−9 −663%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 +1133%	6−7 −1133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +500%	7−8 −500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +550%	4−5 −550%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	55−60 +129%	24 −129%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 +550%	6−7 −550%
Hitman 3	24−27 +550%	4−5 −550%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +388%	8−9 −388%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 +700%	3−4 −700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	42 +950%	4−5 −950%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +425%	4−5 −425%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +533%	3−4 −533%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +875%	4−5 −875%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 +600%	4−5 −600%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +450%	8−9 −450%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 +388%	8−9 −388%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +300%	8−9 −300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 +650%	2−3 −650%