Arc A770 vs Radeon Pro 5600M

Place in performance ranking	211	193
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	11.28
Architecture	Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)	Alchemist
GPU code name	Navi 10	DG2-512
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	15 June 2020 (3 years ago)	12 October 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$329
Current price	no data	$597 (1.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	4096
Core clock speed	no data	2100 MHz
Boost clock speed	1265 MHz	2400 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	7 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	164.8	614.4

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon Pro 5600M and Arc A770 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	2048 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1540 MBps	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	394.2 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 5600M 24.07

Arc A770 25.80
+7.2%

Arc A770 outperforms Radeon Pro 5600M by 7% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Pro 5600M 9313

Arc A770 9984
+7.2%

Arc A770 outperforms Radeon Pro 5600M by 7% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	100−110 −14%	114 +14%
1440p	60−65 −13.3%	68 +13.3%
4K	35−40 −20%	42 +20%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

35−40

−7.7%

40−45
+7.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −35.4%	65 +35.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −119%	92 +119%
Battlefield 5	75−80 −6.4%	80−85 +6.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65 −7.9%	65−70 +7.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −7.7%	40−45 +7.7%
Far Cry 5	60−65 −85.7%	117 +85.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 −87.5%	120 +87.5%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +145%	33 −145%
Hitman 3	70−75 −8.3%	75−80 +8.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −147%	126 +147%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −7.7%	40−45 +7.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 −162%	139 +162%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −122%	102 +122%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 −16.7%	56 +16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −88.1%	79 +88.1%
Battlefield 5	75−80 −6.4%	80−85 +6.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	60−65 −7.9%	65−70 +7.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −7.7%	40−45 +7.7%
Far Cry 5	60−65 −73%	109 +73%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 −78.1%	114 +78.1%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +161%	31 −161%
Hitman 3	70−75 −8.3%	75−80 +8.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −114%	109 +114%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −183%	113 +183%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −7.7%	40−45 +7.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 −132%	123 +132%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −263%	196 +263%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −102%	93 +102%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45−50 +6.7%	45 −6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −71.4%	72 +71.4%
Battlefield 5	75−80 −6.4%	80−85 +6.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	35−40 −7.7%	40−45 +7.7%
Far Cry 5	60−65 −65.1%	104 +65.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	60−65 −60.9%	103 +60.9%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +252%	23 −252%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −33.3%	72 +33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −60.9%	74 +60.9%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −8.1%	40−45 +8.1%
Hitman 3	40−45 −10%	40−45 +10%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −163%	84 +163%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −196%	71 +196%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 −11.1%	20−22 +11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −169%	86 +169%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −53.8%	40 +53.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −150%	60 +150%
Battlefield 5	50−55 −5.6%	55−60 +5.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −13.3%	16−18 +13.3%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −100%	82 +100%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −97.8%	91 +97.8%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +227%	15 −227%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −107%	60 +107%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −228%	59 +228%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −5.3%	20−22 +5.3%
Hitman 3	21−24 −4.3%	24−27 +4.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −50%	24 +50%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −213%	47 +213%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −7.7%	14−16 +7.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −188%	49 +188%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −181%	73 +181%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −100%	30 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −192%	38 +192%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −10.7%	30−35 +10.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −145%	49 +145%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −143%	56 +143%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +325%	8 −325%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 −236%	37 +236%

This is how Pro 5600M and Arc A770 compete in popular games:

Arc A770 is 14% faster in 1080p
Arc A770 is 13% faster in 1440p
Arc A770 is 20% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 5600M is 325% faster than the Arc A770.
in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A770 is 263% faster than the Pro 5600M.

All in all, in popular games:

Pro 5600M is ahead in 6 tests (9%)
Arc A770 is ahead in 61 test (90%)
there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	24.07	25.80
Recency	15 June 2020	12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	7 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	50 Watt	225 Watt