Arc A770 vs Radeon Pro 5600M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro 5600M with Arc A770, including specs and performance data.

Pro 5600M
2020
8 GB HBM2, 50 Watt
22.92

Arc A770 outperforms Pro 5600M by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking238155
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data54.89
Power efficiency33.0610.47
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNavi 12DG2-512
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date15 June 2020 (4 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25604096
Core clock speed1000 MHz2100 MHz
Boost clock speed1030 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistorsno data21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate164.8614.4
Floating-point processing power5.274 TFLOPS19.66 TFLOPS
ROPs64128
TMUs160256
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width2048 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed770 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth394.2 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.21.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Pro 5600M 22.92
Arc A770 32.67
+42.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Pro 5600M 9232
Arc A770 13156
+42.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75−80
−49.3%
112
+49.3%
1440p40−45
−60%
64
+60%
4K27−30
−51.9%
41
+51.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.94
1440pno data5.14
4Kno data8.02

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−164%
116
+164%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−46.9%
70−75
+46.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−29.7%
95−100
+29.7%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−125%
99
+125%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−46.9%
70−75
+46.9%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−190%
304
+190%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
−39.1%
85−90
+39.1%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−90.5%
120
+90.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−30.2%
65−70
+30.2%
Valorant 95−100
−41.7%
130−140
+41.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−29.7%
95−100
+29.7%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−100%
88
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−46.9%
70−75
+46.9%
Dota 2 80−85
−26.5%
105
+26.5%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+5.6%
71
−5.6%
Fortnite 120−130
−27.9%
150−160
+27.9%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−146%
258
+146%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
−39.1%
85−90
+39.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 80−85
−26.5%
105
+26.5%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−57.1%
99
+57.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−23.5%
180−190
+23.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−30.2%
65−70
+30.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
−53.2%
110−120
+53.2%
Valorant 95−100
−41.7%
130−140
+41.7%
World of Tanks 250−260
−9.9%
270−280
+9.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−29.7%
95−100
+29.7%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−88.6%
83
+88.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−46.9%
70−75
+46.9%
Dota 2 80−85
−32.5%
110−120
+32.5%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−21.3%
90−95
+21.3%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−106%
216
+106%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
−39.1%
85−90
+39.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
−23.5%
180−190
+23.5%
Valorant 95−100
−41.7%
130−140
+41.7%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 40−45
−12.5%
45
+12.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
−12.5%
45
+12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−29.6%
160−170
+29.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−50%
30−35
+50%
World of Tanks 160−170
−36.9%
210−220
+36.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−37.5%
65−70
+37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−65%
30−35
+65%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−58%
100−110
+58%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−147%
158
+147%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
−47.4%
55−60
+47.4%
Metro Exodus 55−60
−65.5%
91
+65.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−71.4%
60
+71.4%
Valorant 60−65
−59.4%
100−110
+59.4%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
+0%
10
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
−17.1%
48
+17.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
−17.1%
48
+17.1%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−161%
47
+161%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−47.9%
100−110
+47.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−46.7%
21−24
+46.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
−17.1%
48
+17.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−56%
35−40
+56%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−50%
15
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−75%
14−16
+75%
Dota 2 40−45
−34.1%
55−60
+34.1%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−53.1%
45−50
+53.1%
Fortnite 30−33
−53.3%
45−50
+53.3%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−141%
89
+141%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22
−55%
30−35
+55%
Valorant 30−35
−67.7%
50−55
+67.7%

This is how Pro 5600M and Arc A770 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A770 is 49% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A770 is 60% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A770 is 52% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Pro 5600M is 6% faster.
  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Arc A770 is 190% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Pro 5600M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • Arc A770 is ahead in 59 tests (97%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.92 32.67
Recency 15 June 2020 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 225 Watt

Pro 5600M has 350% lower power consumption.

Arc A770, on the other hand, has a 42.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Pro 5600M in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon Pro 5600M is a mobile workstation card while Arc A770 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Radeon Pro 5600M
Intel Arc A770
Arc A770

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 78 votes

Rate Radeon Pro 5600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 5359 votes

Rate Arc A770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.