Quadro T500 Mobile vs Radeon Pro W5500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon Pro W5300M Radeon Pro W5500M Radeon Pro W6300M Radeon Pro W6600M
VS
Quadro T400 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Max-Q Quadro T1200 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Max-Q T500 Max-Q T550 Mobile T600 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Radeon Pro W5500M and Quadro T500 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Pro W5500M
2020
4 GB GDDR6, 85 Watt
9.00

Contents

Pro W5500M Pro W5500M
T500 Mobile Quadro T500

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking491492
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency7.2834.37
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameNavi 14TU117
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date10 February 2020 (5 years ago)2 December 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408896
Core clock speed1000 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speed1450 MHz1695 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate127.694.92
Floating-point processing power4.083 TFLOPS3.037 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs8856

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.03.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA-7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
−2.9%
36
+2.9%
1440p14−16
−7.1%
15
+7.1%
4K16−18
−6.3%
17
+6.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Dota 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Far Cry 5 28
+0%
28
+0%
Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 31
+0%
31
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+0%
28
+0%
Valorant 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Dota 2 75
+0%
75
+0%
Far Cry 5 27
+0%
27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+0%
19
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 13
+0%
13
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14
+0%
14
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Dota 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how Pro W5500M and T500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • T500 Mobile is 3% faster in 1080p
  • T500 Mobile is 7% faster in 1440p
  • T500 Mobile is 6% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 45 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Recency 10 February 2020 2 December 2020
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 18 Watt

Pro W5500M has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

T500 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and 372.2% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Radeon Pro W5500M and Quadro T500 Mobile.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

AMD Radeon Pro W5500M
Radeon Pro W5500M
NVIDIA Quadro T500 Mobile
Quadro T500
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Pro W5500M Radeon Pro W5500M
vs
Pro 560 Radeon Pro 560
T500 Mobile Quadro T500 Mobile
vs
Pro 460 Radeon Pro 460
Pro W5500M Radeon Pro W5500M
vs
M2000M Quadro M2000M
Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU
vs
Arc 7-Core iGPU 7 Core iGPU
UHD Graphics 630 Intel UHD Graphics 630
vs
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Graphics AMD Radeon Graphics
vs
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
UHD Graphics 630 Mobile Intel UHD Graphics 630 Mobile
vs
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
GT 1030 DDR4 NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
vs
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
RTX 3080 GeForce RTX 3080
vs
GTX 1070 SLI Mobile GTX 1070 SLI Mobile
PRO WX 2100 AMD Radeon PRO WX 2100
vs
GTX 1080 Mobile GTX 1080 Mobile
T1000 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
vs
GTX 1080 Mobile GTX 1080 Mobile
GTX 980MX NVIDIA GTX 980MX
vs
GTX 980 SLI Mobile 980 SLI Mobile
RX 560 AMD Radeon RX 560
vs
GTX 1070 Mobile GTX 1070 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.3 4 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 109 votes

Rate Quadro T500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Radeon Pro W5500M or Quadro T500 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.